{
 "record_id": "CW-2002-0010",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-0007",
 "alias_merged_ids": [],
 "display_title": "Chintalapudi Woman vs The Station House Officer and Ors.",
 "display_title_redacted": "Chintalapudi Woman vs The Station House Officer and Ors.",
 "state": "Andhra Pradesh",
 "district": "Eluru",
 "district_at_time": "West Godavari",
 "city_town": "Chintalapudi",
 "police_station_or_unit": "Chintalapudi Police Station and T. Narasapuram Police Station",
 "court": "Andhra Pradesh High Court",
 "court_as_verified": "Andhra Pradesh High Court",
 "bench": null,
 "case_title": "Chintalapudi Woman vs The Station House Officer and Ors.",
 "case_number": "W.P. Nos. 21782 and 22006 of 2002",
 "citation": "2003 (1) ALT (Cri) 112, 2003 Cri LJ 1404",
 "judges": [
  "B.S.A. Swamy"
 ],
 "judgment_date": "2002-11-21",
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2002,
 "incident_date": "2002-10-28",
 "incident_year": 2002,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "misconduct",
 "admin_subcategory": "false_implication_fabrication",
 "subcategory": "false_implication_fabrication",
 "subcategory_display": "false implication fabrication",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "adverse_finding_compensation",
 "sections": [
  "Constitution of India Art. 21",
  "Constitution of India Art. 226"
 ],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Sub-Inspector of Police",
   "unit": "T. Narasapuram Police Station",
   "role": "held_liable",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "key2_gemapi:no(overruled by grok)",
    "key2_gpt:unclear"
   ],
   "ledger_role": "held_liable",
   "key2": "yes",
   "key2_agy": "yes",
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": "yes",
   "key2_gemapi": "no",
   "key2_openrouter": "yes",
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": "yes",
   "jev_risk": 0.1,
   "jev_p_culpable": 0.91,
   "key2_gpt": "unclear",
   "later_outcome": "none_found",
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Sub-Inspector of Police, T. Narasapuram Police Station"
  },
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Sub-Inspector of Police",
   "unit": "Chintalapudi Police Station",
   "role": "held_liable",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "key2_gemapi:no(overruled by grok)",
    "key2_gpt:unclear"
   ],
   "ledger_role": "held_liable",
   "key2": "yes",
   "key2_agy": "yes",
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": "yes",
   "key2_gemapi": "no",
   "key2_openrouter": "yes",
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": "yes",
   "jev_risk": 0.1,
   "jev_p_culpable": 0.91,
   "key2_gpt": "unclear",
   "later_outcome": "none_found",
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Sub-Inspector of Police, Chintalapudi Police Station"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 2,
 "victims": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "age": null,
   "gender": "male",
   "descriptor": "Chintalapudi man"
  },
  {
   "name": null,
   "age": null,
   "gender": "male",
   "descriptor": "Chintalapudi man"
  }
 ],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 2,
 "sentence_type": "compensation_only",
 "sentence_max_years": null,
 "compensation_inr": 50000,
 "force": "state_police",
 "primary_source_url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1069607/",
 "secondary_sources": [
  "SC SLP by SHO admitted: leave granted 13.02.2004 (Station House Officer vs S. Swathi)"
 ],
 "summary": "The High Court found that the Sub-Inspectors of T. Narasapuram and Chintalapudi Police Stations maliciously foisted false extortion and robbery charges against practicing advocate a Chintalapudi man in retaliation for filing a private complaint against police brutality. The police arrested him at 2 a.m., misled the Magistrate to deny bail, and unlawfully detained him for nearly 20 days. The Court quashed the criminal cases as an abuse of process, held that the officers violated Article 21, and directed the State to pay Rs 50,000 compensation to the advocate with directions to recover the sum from the two officers. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.",
 "summary_verified": "The High Court found that the Sub-Inspectors of T. Narasapuram and Chintalapudi Police Stations maliciously foisted false extortion and robbery charges against practicing advocate a Chintalapudi man in retaliation for filing a private complaint against police brutality. The police arrested him at 2 a.m., misled the Magistrate to deny bail, and unlawfully detained him for nearly 20 days. The Court quashed the criminal cases as an abuse of process, held that the officers violated Article 21, and directed the State to pay Rs 50,000 compensation to the advocate with directions to recover the sum from the two officers.",
 "court_quote": "In the light of the sequence of events, we hold that the police foisted the complaints against Mr. A Chintalapudi man, in retaliation to the private complaint filed by him on behalf of one Marudodla Savitri.",
 "court_quote_para": "30",
 "confidence": "high",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "High Court found two SHOs foisted false cases against advocate in retaliation for complaint against police and ordered Rs 50,000 compensation recoverable from them.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": "2002-11-21",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Andhra Pradesh High Court",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Andhra Pradesh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 50,000.",
   "disposition": "Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only)",
   "source": "2003 (1) ALT (Cri) 112, 2003 Cri LJ 1404",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-19",
   "scope": "Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass",
   "method": "skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)",
   "result": "holds",
   "corrections_applied": []
  }
 ],
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-19",
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1069607/",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "SC SLP by SHO admitted: leave granted 13.02.2004 (Station House Officer vs S. Swathi)",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": true,
 "verified_by": [
  "chunk-01"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "ANDHRA-007",
 "officers_named_public": 0,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}