{
 "record_id": "CW-2007-0026",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-0786",
 "alias_merged_ids": [],
 "display_title": "Parveen Kumar vs Commissioner of Police and Others",
 "display_title_redacted": "Parveen Kumar vs Commissioner of Police and Others",
 "state": "Delhi",
 "district": null,
 "district_at_time": null,
 "city_town": null,
 "police_station_or_unit": null,
 "court": "Delhi High Court",
 "court_as_verified": "Delhi High Court",
 "bench": null,
 "case_title": "Parveen Kumar vs Commissioner of Police and Others",
 "case_number": "W.P.(C) No. 2295 of 2007",
 "citation": "(2007) 98 DRJ 433 : (2008) 1 ILR Delhi 168",
 "judges": [
  "Manmohan Sarin",
  "S.L. Bhayana"
 ],
 "judgment_date": "2007-07-13",
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2007,
 "incident_date": "2003-09-05",
 "incident_year": 2003,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "misconduct",
 "admin_subcategory": "other",
 "subcategory": "other",
 "subcategory_display": "other",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "disciplinary_upheld",
 "sections": [
  "Constitution Art.311(2)(b)",
  "IPC 395"
 ],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": "Parveen Kumar",
   "rank": "Constable",
   "role": "held_liable",
   "unit": "Delhi Police",
   "publish_grade": "named_safe",
   "gate_reasons": [],
   "ledger_role": "held_liable",
   "key2": "yes",
   "key2_agy": "yes",
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": null,
   "key2_gemapi": null,
   "key2_openrouter": null,
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": 0.05,
   "jev_p_culpable": 0.95,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": "none_found",
   "name_public": "Parveen Kumar",
   "display": "Parveen Kumar (Constable)"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 1,
 "victims": [],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 0,
 "sentence_type": "dismissal",
 "sentence_max_years": null,
 "compensation_inr": null,
 "force": "state_police",
 "primary_source_url": "https://www.courtkutchehry.com/judgements/905682/parveen-kumar-appellant-hash-commissioner-of-police-and-others-respondent/",
 "secondary_sources": [
  "https://www.the-laws.com/encyclopedia/browse/case?caseId=107002341100&title=parveen-kumar-vs-commissioner-of-police",
  "https://sooperkanoon.com/case/713870/parveen-kumar-vs-commissioner-police-ors"
 ],
 "summary": "The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of Delhi Police constable Parveen Kumar and upheld his dismissal from service under Article 311(2)(b) for grave criminal misconduct, including complicity with gangster Vikrant @ Vicky in dacoity and robbery and involvement in numerous robbery, dacoity, murder and attempt-to-murder cases across Delhi, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. The Court held the decision to dispense with the departmental enquiry was based on material record and not conjecture, since as a desperate and dangerous person with criminal associates, witnesses would not muster courage to depose against him for fear of reprisal. It found no infirmity in the disciplinary authority's dismissal order dated 20 September 2003 or the Tribunal's orders and dismissed the petition as devoid of merit. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.",
 "summary_verified": "The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of Delhi Police constable Parveen Kumar and upheld his dismissal from service under Article 311(2)(b) for grave criminal misconduct, including complicity with gangster Vikrant @ Vicky in dacoity and robbery and involvement in numerous robbery, dacoity, murder and attempt-to-murder cases across Delhi, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. The Court held the decision to dispense with the departmental enquiry was based on material record and not conjecture, since as a desperate and dangerous person with criminal associates, witnesses would not muster courage to depose against him for fear of reprisal. It found no infirmity in the disciplinary authority's dismissal order dated 20 September 2003 or the Tribunal's orders and dismissed the petition as devoid of merit.",
 "court_quote": "If the law keeper becomes lawbreaker, quick and expedient action ought to be taken, to maintain transparency, accountability and above all to maintain public trust and faith in the Police.",
 "court_quote_para": "19",
 "confidence": "high",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "HC upheld Art.311(2)(b) dismissal of constable involved in dacoity/robbery/murder cases with a gangster.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": "2007-07-13",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Delhi High Court",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Delhi High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.",
   "disposition": "Disciplinary action · Procedural only",
   "source": "(2007) 98 DRJ 433 : (2008) 1 ILR Delhi 168",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-19",
   "scope": "Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass",
   "method": "skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)",
   "result": "holds",
   "corrections_applied": []
  }
 ],
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-19",
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://www.courtkutchehry.com/judgements/905682/parveen-kumar-appellant-hash-commissioner-of-police-and-others-respondent/",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.the-laws.com/encyclopedia/browse/case?caseId=107002341100&title=parveen-kumar-vs-commissioner-of-police",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://sooperkanoon.com/case/713870/parveen-kumar-vs-commissioner-police-ors",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": true,
 "verified_by": [
  "chunk-59"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "GAP2-18-003",
 "officers_named_public": 1,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}