{
 "record_id": "CW-2010-0004",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-0409",
 "alias_merged_ids": [],
 "display_title": "State of Uttaranchal and Others vs Pauri Police Constable and Another",
 "display_title_redacted": "State of Uttaranchal and Others vs Pauri Police Constable and Another",
 "state": "Uttarakhand",
 "district": "Pauri Garhwal",
 "district_at_time": null,
 "city_town": "Pauri",
 "police_station_or_unit": "Police Lines, Pauri",
 "court": "Uttarakhand High Court",
 "court_as_verified": "Uttarakhand High Court",
 "bench": null,
 "case_title": "State of Uttaranchal and Others vs Pauri Police Constable and Another",
 "case_number": null,
 "citation": "(2010) 05 UK CK 0018",
 "judges": [
  "J. S. Khehar",
  "Sudhanshu Dhulia"
 ],
 "judgment_date": "2010-05-18",
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2010,
 "incident_date": "1997-05-08",
 "incident_year": 1997,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "misconduct",
 "admin_subcategory": "other",
 "subcategory": "other",
 "subcategory_display": "other",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "disciplinary_upheld",
 "sections": [],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Constable",
   "unit": "Police Lines, Pauri",
   "role": "held_liable",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "key2:no_row"
   ],
   "ledger_role": "held_liable",
   "key2": null,
   "key2_agy": null,
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": null,
   "key2_gemapi": null,
   "key2_openrouter": null,
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": null,
   "jev_p_culpable": null,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": "none_found",
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Constable, Police Lines, Pauri"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 1,
 "victims": [],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 0,
 "sentence_type": "dismissal",
 "sentence_max_years": null,
 "compensation_inr": null,
 "force": "state_police",
 "primary_source_url": "https://www.courtkutchehry.com/judgements/943219/state-of-uttaranchal-and-others-appellant-hash-the-public-services-tribunal-and-another-responde/",
 "secondary_sources": [],
 "summary": "Replace closing boilerplate to note respondent No.2's recorded case (heel pain, no medical evidence; condonation plea, rejected at paras 5-6). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.",
 "summary_verified": "Replace closing boilerplate to note respondent No.2's recorded case (heel pain, no medical evidence; condonation plea, rejected at paras 5-6).",
 "court_quote": "Ample opportunity was given to respondent No. 2 in the disciplinary proceedings where he failed to establish his case or to justify his continued unauthorised absence for a period of 205 days. The police is a disciplined force and in case the charge of unauthorized absence is proved, it may invite the maximum punishment.",
 "court_quote_para": "5",
 "confidence": "high",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "State writ allowed; Tribunal order set aside; dismissal for 205-day absence restored. No citizen victim.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": "2010-05-18",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Uttarakhand High Court",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Uttarakhand High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.",
   "disposition": "Disciplinary action · Procedural only",
   "source": "(2010) 05 UK CK 0018",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-19",
   "scope": "Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass",
   "method": "skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)",
   "result": "wrong_facts",
   "corrections_applied": [
    "summary"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-19",
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://www.courtkutchehry.com/judgements/943219/state-of-uttaranchal-and-others-appellant-hash-the-public-services-tribunal-and-another-responde/",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": true,
 "verified_by": [
  "chunk-30"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "UTTARA-006",
 "officers_named_public": 0,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}