{
 "record_id": "CW-2010-0036",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-1181",
 "alias_merged_ids": [],
 "display_title": "Delhi Police Constable and others vs CBI",
 "display_title_redacted": "Delhi Police Constable and others vs CBI",
 "state": "Delhi",
 "district": "North East Delhi",
 "district_at_time": null,
 "city_town": "Gokulpuri",
 "police_station_or_unit": "Police Station Gokulpuri",
 "court": "Delhi High Court",
 "court_as_verified": "Delhi High Court",
 "bench": null,
 "case_title": "Delhi Police Constable and others vs CBI",
 "case_number": "Crl.A. Nos. 82 & 75/2002",
 "citation": null,
 "judges": [
  "Sanjiv Khanna"
 ],
 "judgment_date": "2010-11-02",
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2010,
 "incident_date": "1994-03-31",
 "incident_year": 1994,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "corruption",
 "admin_subcategory": "bribery_pc_act",
 "subcategory": "bribery_pc_act",
 "subcategory_display": "bribery pc act",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "conviction_upheld",
 "sections": [
  "IPC 120B",
  "PC Act 1988 s.7",
  "PC Act 1988 s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d)"
 ],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Constable",
   "unit": "Delhi Police, Police Station Gokulpuri",
   "role": "convicted",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "ledger:no_row",
    "key2:no_row"
   ],
   "ledger_role": null,
   "key2": null,
   "key2_agy": null,
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": null,
   "key2_gemapi": null,
   "key2_openrouter": null,
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": null,
   "jev_p_culpable": null,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": null,
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Constable, Delhi Police, Police Station Gokulpuri"
  },
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Head Constable",
   "unit": "Delhi Police, Police Station Gokulpuri",
   "role": "named_only",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "ledger:no_row",
    "key2:no_row"
   ],
   "ledger_role": null,
   "key2": null,
   "key2_agy": null,
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": null,
   "key2_gemapi": null,
   "key2_openrouter": null,
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": null,
   "jev_p_culpable": null,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": null,
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Head Constable, Delhi Police, Police Station Gokulpuri"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 2,
 "victims": [
  {
   "age": null,
   "gender": "male",
   "name": null,
   "descriptor": "Gokulpuri man"
  },
  {
   "age": null,
   "gender": "male",
   "name": null,
   "descriptor": "Gokulpuri man"
  }
 ],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 2,
 "sentence_type": "mixed",
 "sentence_max_years": 3,
 "compensation_inr": null,
 "force": "state_police",
 "primary_source_url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/69757344/",
 "secondary_sources": [],
 "summary": "The judgment of the Delhi High Court records the following account. PS Gokulpuri staff lifted a Gokulpuri man from his jhuggi on the night of 28-29 March 1994, detained him overnight and released him with a direction to pay Rs 5,000; Constable collected the treated notes at a Gokulpuri man's house on 31 March 1994 and was caught in the CBI trap. The Special Judge convicted [name withheld] and Head Constable in January 2002. The Delhi High Court held the case proved beyond doubt against [name withheld] through the complainant, shadow witness and recovery evidence with matching notes and pink washes, and upheld his conviction and sentence in full. It acquitted [name withheld] on benefit of doubt as he was absent from the trap spot, and disposed of both appeals accordingly.",
 "summary_verified": "PS Gokulpuri staff lifted a Gokulpuri man from his jhuggi on the night of 28-29 March 1994, detained him overnight and released him with a direction to pay Rs 5,000; Constable collected the treated notes at a Gokulpuri man's house on 31 March 1994 and was caught in the CBI trap. The Special Judge convicted [name withheld] and Head Constable in January 2002. The Delhi High Court held the case proved beyond doubt against [name withheld] through the complainant, shadow witness and recovery evidence with matching notes and pink washes, and upheld his conviction and sentence in full. It acquitted [name withheld] on benefit of doubt as he was absent from the trap spot, and disposed of both appeals accordingly.",
 "court_quote": "As held above, the conviction and sentence of [name withheld] u/s 7 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the PC Act is upheld and maintained.",
 "court_quote_para": "32",
 "confidence": "high",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "HC judgment verified; constable's PC Act conviction upheld, co-accused HC acquitted on benefit of doubt.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": null,
   "action_type": "Conviction",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Trial court (as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment)",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.",
   "disposition": "Conviction · Supports allegation",
   "source": "Crl.A. Nos. 82 & 75/2002",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  },
  {
   "date": "2010-11-02",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Delhi High Court",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.",
   "disposition": "Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card)",
   "source": "Crl.A. Nos. 82 & 75/2002",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-19",
   "scope": "Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass",
   "method": "skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)",
   "result": "wrong_facts",
   "corrections_applied": [
    "court_quote"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-19",
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/69757344/",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": true,
 "verified_by": [
  "chunk-108"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "GAP3-40-005",
 "officers_named_public": 0,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}