{
 "record_id": "CW-2011-0034",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-0770",
 "alias_merged_ids": [],
 "display_title": "Nagpur Man vs The Superintendent, Nagpur Central Prison and Others",
 "display_title_redacted": "Nagpur Man vs The Superintendent, Nagpur Central Prison and Others",
 "state": "Maharashtra",
 "district": "Nagpur",
 "district_at_time": null,
 "city_town": "Nagpur",
 "police_station_or_unit": "Gadchiroli Police (court/warrant duty)",
 "court": "Bombay High Court",
 "court_as_verified": "Bombay High Court",
 "bench": "Nagpur",
 "case_title": "Nagpur Man vs The Superintendent, Nagpur Central Prison and Others",
 "case_number": "Criminal Writ Petition No. 285 of 2011",
 "citation": "(2011) 08 BOM CK 0119; 2012 (4) Mh.L.J. (Cri.) 609",
 "judges": [
  "V. K. Tahilramani",
  "M. L. Tahaliyani"
 ],
 "judgment_date": "2011-08-02",
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2011,
 "incident_date": "2011-03-30",
 "incident_year": 2011,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "misconduct",
 "admin_subcategory": "illegal_detention_false_imprisonment",
 "subcategory": "illegal_detention_false_imprisonment",
 "subcategory_display": "illegal detention false imprisonment",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "adverse_finding_compensation",
 "sections": [
  "Constitution Art. 21",
  "Constitution Art. 226"
 ],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Police Constable",
   "role": "held_liable",
   "unit": "Gadchiroli Police",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "ledger:no_row",
    "key2:no_row"
   ],
   "ledger_role": null,
   "key2": null,
   "key2_agy": null,
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": null,
   "key2_gemapi": null,
   "key2_openrouter": null,
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": null,
   "jev_p_culpable": null,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": null,
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Police Constable, Gadchiroli Police"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 1,
 "victims": [
  {
   "age": 26,
   "gender": "male",
   "name": null,
   "descriptor": "Nagpur man, age 26"
  }
 ],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 1,
 "sentence_type": "compensation_only",
 "sentence_max_years": null,
 "compensation_inr": 20000,
 "force": "state_police",
 "primary_source_url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/193856127/",
 "secondary_sources": [
  "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5608fc95e4b014971114c544"
 ],
 "summary": "The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) held that a Nagpur man, acquitted in his last sessions case on 29 March 2011, was detained in Nagpur Central Prison from the evening of 30 March to the morning of 3 April 2011 without any authority of law. The Court recorded the SP Gadchiroli's admission that Police Constable, tasked with carrying the jail warrant to court and back, was grossly negligent in failing to return the endorsed warrant, and rejected the two-day-travel excuse for the 160 km journey. It ordered the State to pay Rs 20,000 compensation at Rs 5,000 per day and noted a departmental enquiry against the constable would follow. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.",
 "summary_verified": "The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) held that a Nagpur man, acquitted in his last sessions case on 29 March 2011, was detained in Nagpur Central Prison from the evening of 30 March to the morning of 3 April 2011 without any authority of law. The Court recorded the SP Gadchiroli's admission that Police Constable, tasked with carrying the jail warrant to court and back, was grossly negligent in failing to return the endorsed warrant, and rejected the two-day-travel excuse for the 160 km journey. It ordered the State to pay Rs 20,000 compensation at Rs 5,000 per day and noted a departmental enquiry against the constable would follow.",
 "court_quote": "The gross negligence on the part of Police Constable [name withheld] has been admitted by respondent No.2.",
 "court_quote_para": "7",
 "confidence": "high",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "Division Bench (corrected agent's single-judge claim); Rs 20,000 for 4 days post-acquittal detention.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": "2011-08-02",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Bombay High Court",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Bombay High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 20,000.",
   "disposition": "Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only)",
   "source": "(2011) 08 BOM CK 0119; 2012 (4) Mh.L.J. (Cri.) 609",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [],
 "followup_status": "never_checked",
 "last_checked": null,
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/193856127/",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5608fc95e4b014971114c544",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": true,
 "verified_by": [
  "chunk-57"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "GAP2-10-002",
 "officers_named_public": 0,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}
