{
 "record_id": "CW-2011-0041",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-1182",
 "alias_merged_ids": [],
 "display_title": "Delhi Police Sub-Inspector vs CBI",
 "display_title_redacted": "Delhi Police Sub-Inspector vs CBI",
 "state": "Delhi",
 "district": "South West Delhi",
 "district_at_time": null,
 "city_town": "Vasant Kunj",
 "police_station_or_unit": "Vasant Kunj Police Station",
 "court": "Delhi High Court",
 "court_as_verified": "Delhi High Court",
 "bench": null,
 "case_title": "Delhi Police Sub-Inspector vs CBI",
 "case_number": "Crl.A. No. 129/2003",
 "citation": null,
 "judges": [
  "Rajiv Shakdher"
 ],
 "judgment_date": "2011-09-30",
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2011,
 "incident_date": "1995-03-09",
 "incident_year": 1995,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "corruption",
 "admin_subcategory": "bribery_pc_act",
 "subcategory": "bribery_pc_act",
 "subcategory_display": "bribery pc act",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "conviction_upheld",
 "sections": [
  "PC Act 1988 s.7",
  "PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d)"
 ],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Sub-Inspector",
   "unit": "Delhi Police, Vasant Kunj Police Station",
   "role": "convicted",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "ledger:no_row",
    "key2:no_row"
   ],
   "ledger_role": null,
   "key2": null,
   "key2_agy": null,
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": null,
   "key2_gemapi": null,
   "key2_openrouter": null,
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": null,
   "jev_p_culpable": null,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": null,
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Vasant Kunj Police Station"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 1,
 "victims": [
  {
   "age": null,
   "gender": "male",
   "name": null,
   "descriptor": "Vasant Kunj man"
  }
 ],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 1,
 "sentence_type": "mixed",
 "sentence_max_years": 3,
 "compensation_inr": null,
 "force": "state_police",
 "primary_source_url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/758733/",
 "secondary_sources": [
  "https://www.courtkutchehry.com/judgements/909322/satish-chander-appellant-hash-cbi-respondent/"
 ],
 "summary": "The judgment of the Delhi High Court records the following account. SI, in charge of the Rangpuri Hills area, demanded Rs 10,000 per month from stone-chips dealer a Vasant Kunj man to let his truck business run unimpeded, and accepted a Rs 3,000 instalment inside his room at Vasant Kunj police station in a CBI trap on 9 March 1995. The Special Judge convicted him under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the PC Act with three years RI per count in February 2003. The Delhi High Court held demand, acceptance and recovery proved by the complainant, shadow witness and trap officer with matching notes and positive phenolphthalein washes, despite hostile independent witnesses. It dismissed the appeal as without merit, cancelled bail and ordered the accused taken into custody forthwith.",
 "summary_verified": "SI, in charge of the Rangpuri Hills area, demanded Rs 10,000 per month from stone-chips dealer a Vasant Kunj man to let his truck business run unimpeded, and accepted a Rs 3,000 instalment inside his room at Vasant Kunj police station in a CBI trap on 9 March 1995. The Special Judge convicted him under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the PC Act with three years RI per count in February 2003. The Delhi High Court held demand, acceptance and recovery proved by the complainant, shadow witness and trap officer with matching notes and positive phenolphthalein washes, despite hostile independent witnesses. It dismissed the appeal as without merit, cancelled bail and ordered the accused taken into custody forthwith.",
 "court_quote": "For the reasons given hereinabove, I am of the view that the appeal is without merit and hence, consequently deserves to be dismissed. It is ordered accordingly. Resultantly, the accused shall be taken into custody forthwith.",
 "court_quote_para": "31",
 "confidence": "high",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "HC judgment verified; PC Act conviction of Delhi Police SI sustained, appeal dismissed.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": null,
   "action_type": "Conviction",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Trial court (as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment)",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.",
   "disposition": "Conviction · Supports allegation",
   "source": "Crl.A. No. 129/2003",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  },
  {
   "date": "2011-09-30",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Delhi High Court",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.",
   "disposition": "Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card)",
   "source": "Crl.A. No. 129/2003",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-19",
   "scope": "Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass",
   "method": "skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)",
   "result": "holds",
   "corrections_applied": []
  }
 ],
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-19",
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/758733/",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.courtkutchehry.com/judgements/909322/satish-chander-appellant-hash-cbi-respondent/",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": true,
 "verified_by": [
  "chunk-108"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "GAP3-40-006",
 "officers_named_public": 0,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}