{
 "record_id": "CW-2023-0027",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-0580",
 "alias_merged_ids": [],
 "display_title": "Jaipur Man v. State of Rajasthan",
 "display_title_redacted": "Jaipur Man v. State of Rajasthan",
 "state": "Rajasthan",
 "district": "Jaipur",
 "district_at_time": null,
 "city_town": "Jaipur",
 "police_station_or_unit": "Police Station Galta Gate (FIR 137/2011)",
 "court": "Rajasthan High Court",
 "court_as_verified": "Rajasthan High Court",
 "bench": "Jaipur",
 "case_title": "Jaipur Man v. State of Rajasthan",
 "case_number": "D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 596/2016",
 "citation": "2023:RJ-JP:22328-DB",
 "judges": [
  "Pankaj Bhandari",
  "Bhuwan Goyal"
 ],
 "judgment_date": "2023-09-29",
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2023,
 "incident_date": "2011-05-13",
 "incident_year": 2011,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "misconduct",
 "admin_subcategory": "false_implication_fabrication",
 "subcategory": "false_implication_fabrication",
 "subcategory_display": "false implication fabrication",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "adverse_finding_compensation",
 "sections": [
  "IPC 498A",
  "IPC 302"
 ],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Sub-Inspector",
   "role": "held_liable",
   "unit": "Police Station Galta Gate, Jaipur",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "key2_openrouter:no"
   ],
   "ledger_role": "held_liable",
   "key2": "yes",
   "key2_agy": null,
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": null,
   "key2_gemapi": null,
   "key2_openrouter": "no",
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": 0.67,
   "jev_p_culpable": 0.48,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": "none_found",
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Sub-Inspector, Police Station Galta Gate, Jaipur"
  },
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": null,
   "role": "named_only",
   "unit": "Jaipur police (FIR 137/2011)",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "ledger:named_only",
    "key2:no",
    "key2_openrouter:no"
   ],
   "ledger_role": "named_only",
   "key2": "no",
   "key2_agy": null,
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": null,
   "key2_gemapi": null,
   "key2_openrouter": "no",
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": 0.93,
   "jev_p_culpable": 0.03,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": null,
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Police personnel, Jaipur police (FIR 137/2011)"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 2,
 "victims": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "age": 32,
   "gender": "male",
   "descriptor": "Jaipur man, age 32"
  }
 ],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 1,
 "sentence_type": "compensation_only",
 "sentence_max_years": null,
 "compensation_inr": 2500000,
 "force": "state_police",
 "primary_source_url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/92846988/",
 "secondary_sources": [
  "https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-acquits-wrongly-convicted-wife-murder-state-25-lakhs-compensation-malicious-prosecution-239231"
 ],
 "summary": "The judgment of the Rajasthan High Court records the following account. A Jaipur man was convicted for murdering his wife [name withheld], who self-immolated on 13 May 2011, and sentenced to life plus 3 years under ss.302/498-A IPC, spending over 12 years in jail. The Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur) held the suicide proved and the parchabayan concocted by SI in violation of Rule 6.22 of the Rajasthan Police Rules: recorded in five minutes on 95% burns by a non-gazetted officer without independent witnesses, with the fitness doctor unexamined and the Magistrate approached only after death. It held the entire proceedings were initiated just to falsely implicate the husband, allowed the appeal, acquitted him, and awarded Rs.25,00,000 compensation for wrongful prosecution and the Article 21 violation.",
 "summary_verified": "A Jaipur man was convicted for murdering his wife [name withheld], who self-immolated on 13 May 2011, and sentenced to life plus 3 years under ss.302/498-A IPC, spending over 12 years in jail. The Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur) held the suicide proved and the parchabayan concocted by SI in violation of Rule 6.22 of the Rajasthan Police Rules: recorded in five minutes on 95% burns by a non-gazetted officer without independent witnesses, with the fitness doctor unexamined and the Magistrate approached only after death. It held the entire proceedings were initiated just to falsely implicate the husband, allowed the appeal, acquitted him, and awarded Rs.25,00,000 compensation for wrongful prosecution and the Article 21 violation.",
 "court_quote": "Thus, the entire proceedings have been initiated against the accused just to falsely implicate him.",
 "court_quote_para": "26",
 "confidence": "high",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "Rajasthan HC held suicide proved and husband falsely implicated; acquittal + Rs.25L compensation confirmed.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": "2023-09-29",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Rajasthan High Court",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Rajasthan High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 2,500,000.",
   "disposition": "Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only)",
   "source": "2023:RJ-JP:22328-DB",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-19",
   "scope": "Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass",
   "method": "skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)",
   "result": "holds",
   "corrections_applied": []
  }
 ],
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-19",
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/92846988/",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-acquits-wrongly-convicted-wife-murder-state-25-lakhs-compensation-malicious-prosecution-239231",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": true,
 "verified_by": [
  "chunk-41"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "SWFALSEI-011",
 "officers_named_public": 0,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}