{
 "record_id": "CW-2025-0036",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-1092",
 "alias_merged_ids": [],
 "display_title": "Central Reserve Police Constable No. 850856896 v. Union of India and Others",
 "display_title_redacted": "Central Reserve Police Constable No. 850856896 v. Union of India and Others",
 "state": "Rajasthan",
 "district": "Dausa",
 "district_at_time": null,
 "city_town": "Bandikui",
 "police_station_or_unit": "B/19 Battalion CRPF, Barpeta Road",
 "court": "Rajasthan High Court",
 "court_as_verified": "Rajasthan High Court",
 "bench": "Jaipur",
 "case_title": "Central Reserve Police Constable No. 850856896 v. Union of India and Others",
 "case_number": "S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4181/2001",
 "citation": "2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 93",
 "judges": [
  "Anoop Kumar Dhand"
 ],
 "judgment_date": "2025-02-19",
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2025,
 "incident_date": "1999-10-04",
 "incident_year": 1999,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "misconduct",
 "admin_subcategory": "dereliction_evidence_tampering",
 "subcategory": "dereliction_evidence_tampering",
 "subcategory_display": "dereliction evidence tampering",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "disciplinary_upheld",
 "sections": [],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Constable No. 850856896",
   "role": "held_liable",
   "unit": "B/19 Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force, Barpeta Road, Assam",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "ledger:no_row",
    "key2:no_row"
   ],
   "ledger_role": null,
   "key2": null,
   "key2_agy": null,
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": null,
   "key2_gemapi": null,
   "key2_openrouter": null,
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": null,
   "jev_p_culpable": null,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": null,
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Constable No. 850856896, B/19 Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force, Barpeta Road, Assam"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 1,
 "victims": [],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 0,
 "sentence_type": "dismissal",
 "sentence_max_years": null,
 "compensation_inr": null,
 "force": "central_armed",
 "primary_source_url": "https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/20520004181200111-590138.pdf",
 "secondary_sources": [
  "https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-upholds-crpf-constable-dismissal-absence-from-duty-285905"
 ],
 "summary": "The judgment of the Rajasthan High Court records the following account. CRPF Constable, resident of Salve Kala via Bandikui in Dausa, took 15 days sanctioned leave from 4 October 1999, overstayed about 65 days without intimation while false information of his death was sent to the authorities, and rejoined on 27 December 1999. The court recorded dismissal from service on 28 August 2000 after departmental inquiry and rejection of his appeal on 27 December 2000, challenged by a 2001 writ. The court held wilful unauthorised absence by a member of a disciplined force is the gravest misconduct, distinguished the cited precedents on facts, and dismissed the writ, leaving the dismissal intact. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.",
 "summary_verified": "CRPF Constable, resident of Salve Kala via Bandikui in Dausa, took 15 days sanctioned leave from 4 October 1999, overstayed about 65 days without intimation while false information of his death was sent to the authorities, and rejoined on 27 December 1999. The court recorded dismissal from service on 28 August 2000 after departmental inquiry and rejection of his appeal on 27 December 2000, challenged by a 2001 writ. The court held wilful unauthorised absence by a member of a disciplined force is the gravest misconduct, distinguished the cited precedents on facts, and dismissed the writ, leaving the dismissal intact.",
 "court_quote": "Looking to the fact that the petitioner remained willfully absent from duty on unauthorized leaves without sending any intimation to the respondents authorities and looking to the fact that an incorrect information was sent at his instance that he has passed away, such an act of the petitioner amount to gross misconduct. The petitioner has failed to maintain devotion towards his duty and being a member of the disciplined force, such indiscipline on the part of the petitioner cannot be tolerated.",
 "court_quote_para": "23",
 "confidence": "medium",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "LiveLaw-hosted judgment and report verify CRPF dismissal for absence and false death report upheld.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": "2025-02-19",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Rajasthan High Court",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Rajasthan High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.",
   "disposition": "Disciplinary action · Procedural only",
   "source": "2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 93",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-19",
   "scope": "Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass",
   "method": "skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)",
   "result": "holds",
   "corrections_applied": []
  }
 ],
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-19",
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/20520004181200111-590138.pdf",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-upholds-crpf-constable-dismissal-absence-from-duty-285905",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": true,
 "verified_by": [
  "chunk-96"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "GAP3-126-002",
 "officers_named_public": 0,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}