{
 "record_id": "CW-2025-0077",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-1382",
 "alias_merged_ids": [],
 "display_title": "Telangana Woman & Anr. vs State of Telangana & Anr.",
 "display_title_redacted": "Telangana Woman & Anr. vs State of Telangana & Anr.",
 "state": "Telangana",
 "district": null,
 "district_at_time": null,
 "city_town": null,
 "police_station_or_unit": "Gachibowli Police Station, Cyberabad",
 "court": "Supreme Court of India",
 "court_as_verified": "Supreme Court of India",
 "bench": null,
 "case_title": "Telangana Woman & Anr. vs State of Telangana & Anr.",
 "case_number": "Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 10748 of 2023 (FIR No. 771 of 2020)",
 "citation": "2025 INSC 870",
 "judges": [
  "Vikram Nath",
  "Sandeep Mehta"
 ],
 "judgment_date": "2025-07-18",
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2025,
 "incident_date": "2021-01-13",
 "incident_year": 2021,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "brutality",
 "admin_subcategory": "illegal_detention_false_imprisonment",
 "subcategory": "illegal_detention_false_imprisonment",
 "subcategory_display": "illegal detention false imprisonment",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "adverse_finding",
 "sections": [],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Investigating officers",
   "role": "named_in_finding",
   "unit": "Gachibowli Police Station, Cyberabad (Telangana Police)",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Investigating officers, Gachibowli Police Station, Cyberabad (Telangana Police)"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 1,
 "victims": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "gender": "female",
   "descriptor": "Telangana woman"
  }
 ],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 1,
 "sentence_type": "imprisonment",
 "sentence_max_years": null,
 "compensation_inr": null,
 "force": "state_police",
 "primary_source_url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/189554683/",
 "secondary_sources": [],
 "summary": "The Supreme Court examined the arrest and eight-day custody of a 70-year-old accused in a civil sale-deed dispute under FIR No. 771 of 2020. The Supreme Court held that the complainant was misusing the process of police investigation so as to entangle the accused. The Supreme Court held that the arrest in a civil dispute clearly showed the complainant company's clout on the police agency. The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and all subsequent proceedings as a gross abuse of the process of law.",
 "summary_verified": "The Supreme Court examined the arrest and eight-day custody of a 70-year-old accused in a civil sale-deed dispute under FIR No. 771 of 2020. The Supreme Court held that the complainant was misusing the process of police investigation so as to entangle the accused. The Supreme Court held that the arrest in a civil dispute clearly showed the complainant company's clout on the police agency. The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and all subsequent proceedings as a gross abuse of the process of law.",
 "court_quote": "clearly shows the clout of the company of which the complainant is an agent, on the police agency",
 "court_quote_para": "as summarized from judgment text",
 "confidence": "medium",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "Verified against the cited judgment.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": "2025-07-18",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Supreme Court of India",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Supreme Court of India recorded adverse findings against police personnel.",
   "disposition": "adverse finding compensation",
   "source": "2025 INSC 870",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-24",
   "scope": "Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark)."
  }
 ],
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-24",
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/189554683/",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": false,
 "verified_by": [
  "swarm-verify-cop-tg-hc"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "cop-tg-hc-3",
 "officers_named_public": 0,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}