{
 "record_id": "CW-2026-0006",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-0102",
 "alias_merged_ids": [
  "CWC-0507"
 ],
 "display_title": "Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector v. CBI",
 "display_title_redacted": "Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector v. CBI",
 "state": "Delhi",
 "district": "North West Delhi",
 "district_at_time": null,
 "city_town": "Shakur Basti",
 "police_station_or_unit": "Police Post Shakur Basti",
 "court": "Delhi High Court",
 "court_as_verified": "Delhi High Court",
 "bench": null,
 "case_title": "Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector v. CBI",
 "case_number": "CRL.A. 567/2001",
 "citation": "2026 LiveLaw (Del) 118",
 "judges": [
  "Chandrasekharan Sudha"
 ],
 "judgment_date": "2026-01-28",
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2026,
 "incident_date": "1995-11-08",
 "incident_year": 1995,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "corruption",
 "admin_subcategory": "bribery_pc_act",
 "subcategory": "bribery_pc_act",
 "subcategory_display": "bribery pc act",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "conviction_upheld",
 "sections": [
  "PC Act 1988 s.7",
  "PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2)"
 ],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "Assistant Sub-Inspector",
   "unit": "Police Post Shakur Basti, Delhi Police",
   "role": "convicted",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "key2_gemapi:unclear",
    "key2_openrouter:unclear"
   ],
   "ledger_role": "convicted",
   "key2": "yes",
   "key2_agy": "yes",
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": "yes",
   "key2_gemapi": "unclear",
   "key2_openrouter": "unclear",
   "key2_gpt56": "yes",
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": 0.1,
   "jev_p_culpable": 0.97,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": "pending_appeal",
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Assistant Sub-Inspector, Police Post Shakur Basti, Delhi Police"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 1,
 "victims": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "age": null,
   "gender": null,
   "descriptor": "Shakur Basti resident"
  }
 ],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 1,
 "sentence_type": "mixed",
 "sentence_max_years": 2.5,
 "compensation_inr": null,
 "force": "state_police",
 "primary_source_url": "https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/76028012026crla5672001114115-650055.pdf",
 "secondary_sources": [
  "https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/30-years-on-delhi-high-court-upholds-conviction-police-asi-accepting-5000-bribe-521029",
  "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/26629746/",
  "https://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/India/20260129/4410256.html"
 ],
 "summary": "The Delhi High Court dismissed ASI 's appeal and upheld his conviction by the Special Judge, Tis Hazari (C.C. No. 72/99) under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court found that while posted at Police Post Shakur Basti, he demanded Rs. 10,000 on 8 November 1995 for not harassing the complainant over complaints by the latter's brother, and received Rs. 5,000 on 9 November 1995 in a CBI trap. It held demand and acceptance proved despite partially hostile panch witnesses and the nearly 30-year delay, and upheld the sanction granted by the DCP (North-West). The Court confirmed two-and-a-half years' rigorous imprisonment with fine under Section 7 and one-and-a-half years under Section 13, concurrently, acquitting him only of the Section 384 IPC charge. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.",
 "summary_verified": "The Delhi High Court dismissed ASI 's appeal and upheld his conviction by the Special Judge, Tis Hazari (C.C. No. 72/99) under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court found that while posted at Police Post Shakur Basti, he demanded Rs. 10,000 on 8 November 1995 for not harassing the complainant over complaints by the latter's brother, and received Rs. 5,000 on 9 November 1995 in a CBI trap. It held demand and acceptance proved despite partially hostile panch witnesses and the nearly 30-year delay, and upheld the sanction granted by the DCP (North-West). The Court confirmed two-and-a-half years' rigorous imprisonment with fine under Section 7 and one-and-a-half years under Section 13, concurrently, acquitting him only of the Section 384 IPC charge.",
 "court_quote": "There is no infirmity in the impugned order relating to the guilt of the accused for the offences charged against him and hence, I do not find any grounds calling for an interference into the same. The appeal, sans merit, is thus dismissed.",
 "court_quote_para": "41-42",
 "confidence": "high",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "Delhi HC judgment PDF verified; ASI's ss.7/13 PC Act conviction and sentence upheld.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": null,
   "action_type": "Conviction",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Trial court (as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment)",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.",
   "disposition": "Conviction · Supports allegation",
   "source": "2026 LiveLaw (Del) 118",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-01-28",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Delhi High Court",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.",
   "disposition": "Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card)",
   "source": "2026 LiveLaw (Del) 118",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-04-10",
   "action_type": "Appeal pending",
   "status": "Pending",
   "authority": "Supreme Court of India",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "As of 10 April 2026, an appeal arising from this judgment was pending before the Supreme Court of India (officers: Unnamed personnel); the judgment's findings had not been set aside on that date.",
   "disposition": "Later proceeding · Appeal pending",
   "source": "https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2026/16342/16342_2026_12_27_70004_Order_10-Apr-2026.pdf",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-06-29",
   "action_type": "Appeal pending",
   "status": "Pending",
   "authority": "Supreme Court of India",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "As of 29 June 2026, an appeal arising from this judgment was pending before the Supreme Court of India (officers: [name withheld]); the judgment's findings had not been set aside on that date.",
   "disposition": "Later proceeding · Appeal pending",
   "source": "https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2026/16342/16342_2026_4_1_71788_Order_29-Jun-2026.pdf",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [
  {
   "court": "Supreme Court of India",
   "date": "2026-04-10",
   "url": "https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2026/16342/16342_2026_12_27_70004_Order_10-Apr-2026.pdf",
   "outcome": "pending_appeal"
  },
  {
   "court": "Supreme Court of India",
   "date": "2026-06-29",
   "url": "https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2026/16342/16342_2026_4_1_71788_Order_29-Jun-2026.pdf",
   "outcome": "pending_appeal"
  }
 ],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-19",
   "scope": "Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass",
   "method": "skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)",
   "result": "holds",
   "corrections_applied": []
  }
 ],
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-19",
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/76028012026crla5672001114115-650055.pdf",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/30-years-on-delhi-high-court-upholds-conviction-police-asi-accepting-5000-bribe-521029",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://indiankanoon.org/doc/26629746/",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/India/20260129/4410256.html",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": true,
 "verified_by": [
  "chunk-15",
  "chunk-31",
  "chunk-38",
  "chunk-r09"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "SWBRIBER-003",
 "officers_named_public": 0,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}