{
 "record_id": "CW-2026-0057",
 "status": "current",
 "merged_id": "CWC-0944",
 "alias_merged_ids": [
  "CWC-1451"
 ],
 "display_title": "Noida Woman vs Union of India and 4 Others",
 "display_title_redacted": "Noida Woman vs Union of India and 4 Others",
 "state": "Uttar Pradesh",
 "district": "Gautam Buddha Nagar",
 "district_at_time": null,
 "city_town": "Noida",
 "police_station_or_unit": "U.P. Police, Gautam Buddha Nagar Commissionerate (Sector-39 / Sector-142 / Sector-14A Police Stations, Noida)",
 "court": "Allahabad High Court",
 "court_as_verified": "Allahabad High Court",
 "bench": null,
 "case_title": "Noida Woman vs Union of India and 4 Others",
 "case_number": "Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 960 of 2026",
 "citation": "2026 LiveLaw (AB) 645",
 "judges": [
  "Atul Sreedharan",
  "Achal Sachdev"
 ],
 "judgment_date": null,
 "date_precision": "day",
 "judgment_year": 2026,
 "incident_date": "2026-04-11",
 "incident_year": 2026,
 "category": "Other",
 "admin_category": "misconduct",
 "admin_subcategory": "illegal_detention_false_imprisonment",
 "subcategory": "illegal_detention_false_imprisonment",
 "subcategory_display": "illegal detention false imprisonment",
 "protest_override_heuristic": false,
 "outcome_type": "adverse_finding_compensation",
 "sections": [
  "BNS ss.191(1), 191(2), 115(2), 121(1), 125(a), 351(3), 352",
  "Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 1932 s.7",
  "NSA 1980 (detention order quashed)",
  "BNSS s.130",
  "Constitution Art.21"
 ],
 "officers": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "rank": "SHO",
   "role": "held_liable",
   "unit": "Police Station, Gautam Buddha Nagar",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "gate_reasons": [
    "ledger:no_row",
    "key2:no_row"
   ],
   "ledger_role": null,
   "key2": null,
   "key2_agy": null,
   "key2_claude": null,
   "key2_union": null,
   "key2_gemapi": null,
   "key2_openrouter": null,
   "key2_gpt56": null,
   "grok": null,
   "jev_risk": null,
   "jev_p_culpable": null,
   "key2_gpt": null,
   "later_outcome": null,
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "SHO, Police Station, Gautam Buddha Nagar"
  }
 ],
 "officer_count": 2,
 "victims": [
  {
   "name": null,
   "age": 24,
   "gender": "female",
   "descriptor": "Noida woman, age 24"
  }
 ],
 "victims_redacted": null,
 "anonymised": false,
 "victim_count": 1,
 "sentence_type": "compensation_only",
 "sentence_max_years": null,
 "compensation_inr": 500000,
 "force": "state_police",
 "primary_source_url": "https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/2026/09/07/akriti-chaudhary-vs-union-of-india-and-4-others-2026-livelaw-ab-645-allahabad-high-court-698671.pdf",
 "secondary_sources": [
  "https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-nsa-detention-akriti-chaudhary-orwellian-dystopia-548946",
  "https://www.barandbench.com/news/noida-workers-protest-allahabad-high-court-quashes-nsa-detention-of-du-grad-akriti-chaudhary"
 ],
 "summary": "Replace closing boilerplate with the recorded State case (paras 15-21, 32) and add the limit: NSA detention quashed but petitioner remains in judicial custody as undertrial in other cases pending bail (paras 33-34).",
 "summary_verified": "Replace closing boilerplate with the recorded State case (paras 15-21, 32) and add the limit: NSA detention quashed but petitioner remains in judicial custody as undertrial in other cases pending bail (paras 33-34).",
 "court_quote": "this Court considers it sufficient to grant ₹5 lakhs as compensation to the petitioner. This Court also directs that the said amount must be recovered from the salary of the District Magistrate Gautam Buddha Nagar, who has passed this order of detention without application of mind and from all such other officers who may have been responsible, right down to the SHO of the Police Station, who had prepared the initial report warranting the detention of the petitioner under the provisions of the NSA.",
 "court_quote_para": "33",
 "confidence": "high",
 "verdict": "accept",
 "verdict_note": "HC quashed NSA detention as violative of Art. 21; Rs.5 lakh compensation recoverable from DM down to SHO.",
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "tier_history": [
  "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded"
 ],
 "allegations": [
  {
   "category": "Other",
   "primary": true,
   "position": "Material fact supported",
   "position_explainer": "Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.",
   "official_finding_relation": "supports allegation"
  }
 ],
 "institutional_response": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-02",
   "action_type": "Order issued",
   "status": "Concluded",
   "authority": "Allahabad High Court",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "The Allahabad High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 500,000.",
   "disposition": "Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only)",
   "source": "2026 LiveLaw (AB) 645",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-09-13",
   "action_type": "Appeal pending",
   "status": "Pending",
   "authority": "Supreme Court of India",
   "independence": "External",
   "legal_effect": "Binding",
   "description": "As of 13 September 2026, an appeal arising from this judgment was pending before the Supreme Court of India (officers: ); the judgment's findings had not been set aside on that date.",
   "disposition": "Later proceeding · Appeal pending",
   "source": "https://www.earlytimes.in/newsdet.aspx?q=406136",
   "recheck": "Not yet re-checked."
  }
 ],
 "later_proceedings": [
  {
   "court": "Supreme Court of India",
   "date": "2026-09-13",
   "url": "https://www.earlytimes.in/newsdet.aspx?q=406136",
   "outcome": "pending_appeal"
  }
 ],
 "final_outcome_url": null,
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-19",
   "scope": "Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass",
   "method": "skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)",
   "result": "wrong_facts",
   "corrections_applied": [
    "court_quote_para",
    "summary"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-19",
 "link_checked_per_url": [
  {
   "url": "https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/2026/09/07/akriti-chaudhary-vs-union-of-india-and-4-others-2026-livelaw-ab-645-allahabad-high-court-698671.pdf",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-nsa-detention-akriti-chaudhary-orwellian-dystopia-548946",
   "link_checked": null
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.barandbench.com/news/noida-workers-protest-allahabad-high-court-quashes-nsa-detention-of-du-grad-akriti-chaudhary",
   "link_checked": null
  }
 ],
 "source_assessment": {
  "established": null,
  "basis": null
 },
 "v3_basis": null,
 "publication_basis": null,
 "reviews": [],
 "retracted": {
  "is_retracted": false
 },
 "fidelity_checked": true,
 "verified_by": [
  "chunk-56",
  "chunk-79"
 ],
 "merged_case_id": "GAP2-4-003",
 "officers_named_public": 0,
 "record_flag": null,
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}