{
 "case_id": "t2w4-20-002",
 "alias_case_ids": [],
 "verification_status": "V2",
 "gate_status": "V2",
 "verify_passes": {
  "t2w4-20-002": {
   "mverify": "accept",
   "mverify2": "accept"
  }
 },
 "verified_by": "t2mverify2-chunk-094 (SECOND independent pass — do not read any other verifier's output)",
 "verified_at": "2026-09-18T20:03:05.942335+00:00",
 "verdict_note": "JMFC Gool convicted SPO with probation; J&K HC upheld disengagement on conviction.",
 "state": "Jammu and Kashmir",
 "district": "Ramban",
 "court": "Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gool",
 "court_level": "magistrate",
 "trial_court_name": "Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gool",
 "case_title": "State v. J&K Police Special Police Officer (SPO) and others",
 "case_number": "FIR No. 58/2013",
 "conviction_date": "2018-06-06",
 "conviction_year": 2018,
 "date_precision": "day",
 "incident_date": "2013-01-01",
 "incident_year": 2013,
 "category": "misconduct",
 "subcategory": "other",
 "raw_subcategory": "other",
 "outcome_type": "trial_court_conviction",
 "officers": [
  {
   "rank": "Special Police Officer (SPO)",
   "unit": "J&K Police, District Ramban",
   "publish_grade": "unnamed",
   "name_public": null,
   "display": "Special Police Officer (SPO), J&K Police, District Ramban",
   "key2_union": "no",
   "name": null
  }
 ],
 "victims": [],
 "sections": [
  "RPC 336",
  "RPC 147",
  "RPC 427"
 ],
 "sentence": "Convicted; released on probation (benefit of probation extended by the Magistrate; no custodial term)",
 "sentence_type": null,
 "sentence_max_years": null,
 "appeal_status": "none_known",
 "appeal_url": null,
 "source_kind": "judgment",
 "source_agency": "High Court of J&K and Ladakh (Justice Sanjay Dhar, [name withheld] vs UT of J&K, decided ~October 2022) recording JMFC Gool conviction",
 "primary_source_url": "https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/jkl-hc-police-service-437946.pdf",
 "secondary_sources": [
  "https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/jkl-high-court-police-official-convicted-person-termination-of-service-jk-police-act-210975"
 ],
 "summary": "Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gool convicted SPO [name withheld] of District Ramban (with co-accused) in FIR No.58/2013 under RPC ss.336, 147 and 427 vide judgment dated 06.06.2018, extending the benefit of probation to all convicts. Following the conviction he was disengaged from the SPO rolls; the High Court of J&K and Ladakh (Justice Sanjay Dhar, 2022) upheld the disengagement, holding a person convicted of a criminal charge is not fit to serve in police even as an SPO. No criminal appeal against the conviction is stated.",
 "court_quote": "A person, who has been convicted of a criminal charge is definitely not fit to serve as police official/officer not even as an SPO.",
 "confidence": "high",
 "tier": "Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded",
 "source_job": "t2w4-20",
 "r8_check": {
  "date": "2026-09-19",
  "member_verdicts": {
   "t2w4-20-002": "wrong_facts"
  },
  "applied": [
   "summary"
  ],
  "noted": []
 },
 "verification_badge": "V2 · Externally reported",
 "tier_badge": "Externally reported",
 "subcategory_display": "other",
 "last_checked": "2026-09-19",
 "followup_status": "checked",
 "followup_history": [
  {
   "date": "2026-09-19",
   "scope": "Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass",
   "method": "skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published row against the official source (reverify/t2-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)",
   "result": "t2w4-20-002=wrong_facts",
   "corrections_applied": [
    "summary"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "case_title_or_number": "State vs J&K Police Special Police Officer (SPO) and others",
 "service": "police",
 "watch": "babuwatch"
}