# Delhi Police Head Constable v. State (Delhi Administration)

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-1976-0001](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-1976-0001)

## Report card

By judgment dated 8 January 1976 in Criminal Appeal No. 209 of 1971, the Supreme Court of India (Coram: P. K. Goswami, P. N. Shingal, JJ.) affirmed the conviction of the Head Constable, Lahori Gate Police Station, Delhi Police.

- Register number: DL 06 CW 0002
- Case reference: Criminal Appeal No. 209 of 1971 / (1976) 1 SCC 644; AIR 1976 SC 449
- Court and date: Supreme Court of India (Coram: P. K. Goswami, P. N. Shingal, JJ.), 8 January 1976
- Officer(s) at the material time: Head Constable, Lahori Gate Police Station, Delhi Police
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947
- Finding of the Court (extract): “The High Court and the trial court cannot, therefore, be said to have made any gross error of law in appreciating the evidence and coming to the conclusion that the charges against the accused were fully established.” (at para n/a)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 1 year.
- Present status of the proceedings: No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/540986/); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-1976-0001)

**Record:** CW-1976-0001 (compiler id CWC-0350); case SWBRIBER-016
**Title:** Delhi Police Head Constable v. State (Delhi Administration)
**Court:** Supreme Court of India; judges: P. K. Goswami; P. N. Shingal
**Case number / citation:** Criminal Appeal No. 209 of 1971 / (1976) 1 SCC 644; AIR 1976 SC 449
**Judgment:** 1976-01-08 (1976, day precision)
**Incident date:** 1969-04-08 (1969)
**Place:** Central Delhi, Delhi; city town: Delhi; police station or unit: Lahori Gate Police Station; force: state_police
**Category:** Bribery & extortion
**Sub-category:** bribery pc act
**Outcome:** Conviction upheld (conviction_upheld)
**Sections:** IPC 161; PC Act 1947 s.5(2); PC Act 1947 s.5(1)(d)
**Officers (gated display forms):** Head Constable, Lahori Gate Police Station, Delhi Police (1 in record)
**Victims:** Delhi man (1 in record)
**Sentence / compensation:** mixed; max 1 yrs
**Sentence type:** mixed (mixed)

The Supreme Court dismissed Criminal Appeal 209 of 1971 and upheld the conviction of Head Constable of Lahori Gate police station under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2)/5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947, already affirmed by the Delhi High Court. The Court found complainant \[name withheld\], an unlicensed hawker, complained on 7 April 1969 that the Head Constable demanded Rs 10 for not challaning his brother and Rs 50 for future immunity, and an Anti-Corruption trap caught him with the money passing into his pocket. It held trap witnesses are neither accomplices nor interested per se and rejected the charge-prejudice and planting defences. The 1-year RI sentences with Rs 100 fine were maintained and surrender directed. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

> The High Court and the trial court cannot, therefore, be said to have made any gross error of law in appreciating the evidence and coming to the conclusion that the charges against the accused were fully established.

**Sources (2):** [indiankanoon.org](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/540986/); [advocatekhoj.com](https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/judgments/index.php?go=1976/january/maha-singh-vs-state-insc-2-8-january-1976-2)
**Verification:** V2 · Externally reported
**Review:** Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded
**admin category:** corruption
**admin subcategory:** bribery_pc_act
**allegations:** {'category': 'Other', 'primary': True, 'position': 'Material fact supported', 'position_explainer': 'Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.', 'official_finding_relation': 'supports allegation'}
**anonymised:** False
**court quote para:** n/a
**display title redacted:** Delhi Police Head Constable v. State (Delhi Administration)
**followup history:** {'date': '2026-09-19', 'scope': 'Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass', 'method': 'skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)', 'result': 'holds', 'corrections_applied': \[\]}
**followup status:** checked
**institutional response:** {'date': None, 'action_type': 'Conviction', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Trial court (as recorded in the Supreme Court of India judgment)', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Supreme Court of India judgment.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation', 'source': '(1976) 1 SCC 644; AIR 1976 SC 449', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}; {'date': '1976-01-08', 'action_type': 'Order issued', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Supreme Court of India', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The Supreme Court of India dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card)', 'source': '(1976) 1 SCC 644; AIR 1976 SC 449', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}
**last checked:** 2026-09-19
**link checked per url:** {'url': 'https://indiankanoon.org/doc/540986/', 'link_checked': None}; {'url': 'https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/judgments/index.php?go=1976/january/maha-singh-vs-state-insc-2-8-january-1976-2', 'link_checked': None}
**retracted:** {"is_retracted": false}
**service:** police
**source assessment:** {"established": null, "basis": null}
**status:** current
**subcategory display:** bribery pc act
**tier:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**tier badge:** Externally reported
**tier history:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**verdict:** accept
**verdict note:** SC judgment verified via mirror (primary 429); Head Constable bribery conviction upheld, surrender directed.
**verification badge:** V2 · Externally reported
**verification status:** V2
**watch:** babuwatch

Status: Conviction upheld.

[Open CW-1976-0001](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-1976-0001)
