# Nand Nagri Police Sub-Inspector vs C.B.I.

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2009-0011](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2009-0011)

## Report card

By judgment dated 6 February 2009 in Crl.A. No.163/2004, the Delhi High Court (Coram: Aruna Suresh, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Sub-Inspector, Police Station Nand Nagri.

- Register number: DL 05 CW 0005
- Case reference: Crl.A. No.163/2004
- Court and date: Delhi High Court (Coram: Aruna Suresh, J.), 6 February 2009
- Officer(s) at the material time: Sub-Inspector, Police Station Nand Nagri
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract): “no merit in this appeal. The same is accordingly dismissed.” (at para 49)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment; maximum substantive term of 1.5 years.
- Present status of the proceedings: No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/86687864/); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2009-0011)

**Record:** CW-2009-0011 (compiler id CWC-0672); case GAP7-004
**Title:** Nand Nagri Police Sub-Inspector vs C.B.I.
**Court:** Delhi High Court; judges: Aruna Suresh
**Case number / citation:** Crl.A. No.163/2004
**Judgment:** 2009-02-06 (2009, day precision)
**Incident date:** 1998-03-23 (1998)
**Place:** Shahdara, Delhi; city town: Nand Nagri; police station or unit: Police Station Nand Nagri; force: state_police
**Category:** Bribery & extortion
**Sub-category:** bribery pc act
**Outcome:** Conviction upheld (conviction_upheld)
**Sections:** PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d)
**Officers (gated display forms):** Sub-Inspector, Police Station Nand Nagri (1 in record)
**Victims:** Nand Nagri woman (1 in record)
**Sentence / compensation:** imprisonment; max 1.5 yrs
**Sentence type:** imprisonment (imprisonment)

The judgment of the Delhi High Court records the following account. Sub-Inspector of PS Nand Nagri, who had arrested \[name withheld\], demanded Rs.4,000 from the arrestee's mother \[name withheld\] on 23 March 1998 at Karkardooma Courts for getting her son released on bail; she complained to the CBI and a trap on 24 March 1998 caught him accepting the bribe at the police station. The Special Judge convicted him under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the PC Act, 1988 (1 year and 1.5 years RI with fines, concurrent). The High Court held demand and acceptance proved through the complainant, shadow witness and trap recovery, rejected pleas of defective sanction and false implication, and dismissed the appeal, directing surrender within a week.

> no merit in this appeal. The same is accordingly dismissed.

**Sources (1):** [indiankanoon.org](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/86687864/)
**Verification:** V2 · Externally reported
**Review:** Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded
**admin category:** corruption
**admin subcategory:** bribery_pc_act
**allegations:** {'category': 'Other', 'primary': True, 'position': 'Material fact supported', 'position_explainer': 'Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.', 'official_finding_relation': 'supports allegation'}
**anonymised:** False
**court quote para:** 49
**display title redacted:** Nand Nagri Police Sub-Inspector vs C.B.I.
**followup history:** {'date': '2026-09-19', 'scope': 'Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass', 'method': 'skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)', 'result': 'holds', 'corrections_applied': \['court_quote_para'\]}
**followup status:** checked
**institutional response:** {'date': None, 'action_type': 'Conviction', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Trial court (as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment)', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation', 'source': 'Crl.A. No.163/2004', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}; {'date': '2009-02-06', 'action_type': 'Order issued', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Delhi High Court', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card)', 'source': 'Crl.A. No.163/2004', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}
**last checked:** 2026-09-19
**link checked per url:** {'url': 'https://indiankanoon.org/doc/86687864/', 'link_checked': None}
**retracted:** {"is_retracted": false}
**service:** police
**source assessment:** {"established": null, "basis": null}
**status:** current
**subcategory display:** bribery pc act
**tier:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**tier badge:** Externally reported
**tier history:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**verdict:** accept
**verdict note:** Bribery conviction of SI (Rs.4,000 trap) upheld; 1.5y max RI concurrent; surrender ordered.
**verification badge:** V2 · Externally reported
**verification status:** V2
**watch:** babuwatch

Status: Conviction upheld.

[Open CW-2009-0011](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2009-0011)
