# Jahangir Puri Police Sub-Inspector vs CBI

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0025](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0025)

## Report card

By judgment dated 6 May 2011 in Crl.A. No.995/2002, the Delhi High Court (Coram: Suresh Kait, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Sub-Inspector, Police Station Jahangir Puri.

- Register number: DL 08 CW 0010
- Case reference: Crl.A. No.995/2002
- Court and date: Delhi High Court (Coram: Suresh Kait, J.), 6 May 2011
- Officer(s) at the material time: Sub-Inspector, Police Station Jahangir Puri
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract): “no discrepancies in the order/judgment passed by trial Judge, therefore, I confirm the same.” (at para 66)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment; maximum substantive term of 3 years.
- Present status of the proceedings: No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/163706068/); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0025)

**Record:** CW-2011-0025 (compiler id CWC-0676); case GAP7-007
**Title:** Jahangir Puri Police Sub-Inspector vs CBI
**Court:** Delhi High Court; judges: Suresh Kait
**Case number / citation:** Crl.A. No.995/2002
**Judgment:** 2011-05-06 (2011, day precision)
**Incident date:** 1995-07-12 (1995)
**Place:** North West Delhi, Delhi; city town: Jahangir Puri; police station or unit: Police Station Jahangir Puri; force: state_police
**Category:** Bribery & extortion
**Sub-category:** bribery pc act
**Outcome:** Conviction upheld (conviction_upheld)
**Sections:** PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d)
**Officers (gated display forms):** Sub-Inspector, Police Station Jahangir Puri (1 in record)
**Victims:** Jahangir Puri man (1 in record)
**Sentence / compensation:** imprisonment; max 3 yrs
**Sentence type:** imprisonment (imprisonment)

The judgment of the Delhi High Court records the following account. Sub-Inspector of PS Jahangir Puri demanded and accepted Rs.5,000 from complainant \[name withheld\] on 12 July 1995 as a reward for official favour in a bank-fraud complaint; the CBI trap the same evening recovered the tainted money from him at the police station with positive hand and pant wash. The Special Judge convicted him in December 2002 under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the PC Act, 1988 (2 years and 3 years SI with fines, concurrent). The High Court held demand, acceptance, recovery and motive proved, confirmed the conviction and sentence, dismissed the appeal and cancelled bail bonds with surrender directions.

> no discrepancies in the order/judgment passed by trial Judge, therefore, I confirm the same.

**Sources (1):** [indiankanoon.org](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/163706068/)
**Verification:** V2 · Externally reported
**Review:** Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded
**admin category:** corruption
**admin subcategory:** bribery_pc_act
**allegations:** {'category': 'Other', 'primary': True, 'position': 'Material fact supported', 'position_explainer': 'Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.', 'official_finding_relation': 'supports allegation'}
**anonymised:** False
**court quote para:** 66
**display title redacted:** Jahangir Puri Police Sub-Inspector vs CBI
**followup history:** {'date': '2026-09-19', 'scope': 'Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass', 'method': 'skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)', 'result': 'holds', 'corrections_applied': \['court_quote_para'\]}
**followup status:** checked
**institutional response:** {'date': None, 'action_type': 'Conviction', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Trial court (as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment)', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation', 'source': 'Crl.A. No.995/2002', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}; {'date': '2011-05-06', 'action_type': 'Order issued', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Delhi High Court', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card)', 'source': 'Crl.A. No.995/2002', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}
**last checked:** 2026-09-19
**link checked per url:** {'url': 'https://indiankanoon.org/doc/163706068/', 'link_checked': None}
**retracted:** {"is_retracted": false}
**service:** police
**source assessment:** {"established": null, "basis": null}
**status:** current
**subcategory display:** bribery pc act
**tier:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**tier badge:** Externally reported
**tier history:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**verdict:** accept
**verdict note:** Bribery conviction of SI (Rs.5,000 CBI trap) confirmed with 3y max SI; appeal dismissed.
**verification badge:** V2 · Externally reported
**verification status:** V2
**watch:** babuwatch

Status: Conviction upheld.

[Open CW-2011-0025](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0025)