# Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector vs State (CBI)

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0028](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0028)

## Report card

By judgment dated 21 April 2011 in Crl.A. No. 113/2003, the Delhi High Court (Coram: Rajiv Shakdher, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Assistant Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Police Station Gokul Puri.

- Register number: DL 05 CW 0011
- Case reference: Crl.A. No. 113/2003
- Court and date: Delhi High Court (Coram: Rajiv Shakdher, J.), 21 April 2011
- Officer(s) at the material time: Assistant Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Police Station Gokul Puri
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract): “I am of the view that the case of the prosecution against the Appellant has been proved beyond reasonable doubt. Resultantly, the impugned judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court is sustained.” (at para 33)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment.
- Present status of the proceedings: No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1136707/); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0028)

**Record:** CW-2011-0028 (compiler id CWC-1177); case GAP3-40-001
**Title:** Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector vs State (CBI)
**Court:** Delhi High Court; judges: Rajiv Shakdher
**Case number / citation:** Crl.A. No. 113/2003
**Judgment:** 2011-04-21 (2011, day precision)
**Incident date:** 1996-09-15 (1996)
**Place:** North East Delhi, Delhi; city town: Gokulpuri; police station or unit: Police Station Gokul Puri; force: state_police
**Category:** Bribery & extortion
**Sub-category:** bribery pc act
**Outcome:** Conviction upheld (conviction_upheld)
**Sections:** PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2)
**Officers (gated display forms):** Assistant Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Police Station Gokul Puri (1 in record)
**Victims:** Gokulpuri man (1 in record)
**Sentence / compensation:** imprisonment
**Sentence type:** imprisonment (imprisonment)

The judgment of the Delhi High Court records the following account. ASI, investigating officer of FIR No. 645/1996, demanded a Rs 2,000 bribe from the accused in that case and was caught in a CBI trap laid on the complainant's complaint of 21 September 1996. The Special Judge, Tis Hazari convicted him under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the PC Act in February 2003. The Delhi High Court held the trap evidence, including treated-note recovery and hand wash, proved demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt. It sustained the conviction and sentence, dismissed the appeal, and ordered the appellant taken into custody to serve the remaining sentence.

> I am of the view that the case of the prosecution against the Appellant has been proved beyond reasonable doubt. Resultantly, the impugned judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court is sustained.

**Sources (2):** [indiankanoon.org](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1136707/); [indiankanoon.org](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/135488057/)
**Verification:** V2 · Externally reported
**Review:** Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded
**admin category:** corruption
**admin subcategory:** bribery_pc_act
**allegations:** {'category': 'Other', 'primary': True, 'position': 'Material fact supported', 'position_explainer': 'Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.', 'official_finding_relation': 'supports allegation'}
**anonymised:** False
**court quote para:** 33
**display title redacted:** Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector vs State (CBI)
**followup history:** {'date': '2026-09-19', 'scope': 'Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass', 'method': 'skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)', 'result': 'wrong_facts', 'corrections_applied': \['court_quote'\]}
**followup status:** checked
**institutional response:** {'date': None, 'action_type': 'Conviction', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Trial court (as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment)', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation', 'source': 'Crl.A. No. 113/2003', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}; {'date': '2011-04-21', 'action_type': 'Order issued', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Delhi High Court', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card)', 'source': 'Crl.A. No. 113/2003', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}
**last checked:** 2026-09-19
**link checked per url:** {'url': 'https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1136707/', 'link_checked': None}; {'url': 'https://indiankanoon.org/doc/135488057/', 'link_checked': None}
**retracted:** {"is_retracted": false}
**service:** police
**source assessment:** {"established": null, "basis": null}
**status:** current
**subcategory display:** bribery pc act
**tier:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**tier badge:** Externally reported
**tier history:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**verdict:** accept
**verdict note:** HC judgment verified; PC Act conviction of Delhi Police ASI sustained on appeal.
**verification badge:** V2 · Externally reported
**verification status:** V2
**watch:** babuwatch

Status: Conviction upheld.

[Open CW-2011-0028](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0028)