# Delhi Police Sub-Inspector vs CBI

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0041](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0041)

## Report card

By judgment dated 30 September 2011 in Crl.A. No. 129/2003, the Delhi High Court (Coram: Rajiv Shakdher, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Vasant Kunj Police Station.

- Register number: DL 09 CW 0009
- Case reference: Crl.A. No. 129/2003
- Court and date: Delhi High Court (Coram: Rajiv Shakdher, J.), 30 September 2011
- Officer(s) at the material time: Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Vasant Kunj Police Station
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract): “For the reasons given hereinabove, I am of the view that the appeal is without merit and hence, consequently deserves to be dismissed. It is ordered accordingly. Resultantly, the accused shall be taken into custody forthwith.” (at para 31)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 3 years.
- Present status of the proceedings: No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/758733/); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0041)

**Record:** CW-2011-0041 (compiler id CWC-1182); case GAP3-40-006
**Title:** Delhi Police Sub-Inspector vs CBI
**Court:** Delhi High Court; judges: Rajiv Shakdher
**Case number / citation:** Crl.A. No. 129/2003
**Judgment:** 2011-09-30 (2011, day precision)
**Incident date:** 1995-03-09 (1995)
**Place:** South West Delhi, Delhi; city town: Vasant Kunj; police station or unit: Vasant Kunj Police Station; force: state_police
**Category:** Bribery & extortion
**Sub-category:** bribery pc act
**Outcome:** Conviction upheld (conviction_upheld)
**Sections:** PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d)
**Officers (gated display forms):** Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Vasant Kunj Police Station (1 in record)
**Victims:** Vasant Kunj man (1 in record)
**Sentence / compensation:** mixed; max 3 yrs
**Sentence type:** mixed (mixed)

The judgment of the Delhi High Court records the following account. SI, in charge of the Rangpuri Hills area, demanded Rs 10,000 per month from stone-chips dealer a Vasant Kunj man to let his truck business run unimpeded, and accepted a Rs 3,000 instalment inside his room at Vasant Kunj police station in a CBI trap on 9 March 1995. The Special Judge convicted him under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the PC Act with three years RI per count in February 2003. The Delhi High Court held demand, acceptance and recovery proved by the complainant, shadow witness and trap officer with matching notes and positive phenolphthalein washes, despite hostile independent witnesses. It dismissed the appeal as without merit, cancelled bail and ordered the accused taken into custody forthwith.

> For the reasons given hereinabove, I am of the view that the appeal is without merit and hence, consequently deserves to be dismissed. It is ordered accordingly. Resultantly, the accused shall be taken into custody forthwith.

**Sources (2):** [indiankanoon.org](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/758733/); [courtkutchehry.com](https://www.courtkutchehry.com/judgements/909322/satish-chander-appellant-hash-cbi-respondent/)
**Verification:** V2 · Externally reported
**Review:** Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded
**admin category:** corruption
**admin subcategory:** bribery_pc_act
**allegations:** {'category': 'Other', 'primary': True, 'position': 'Material fact supported', 'position_explainer': 'Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.', 'official_finding_relation': 'supports allegation'}
**anonymised:** False
**court quote para:** 31
**display title redacted:** Delhi Police Sub-Inspector vs CBI
**followup history:** {'date': '2026-09-19', 'scope': 'Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass', 'method': 'skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)', 'result': 'holds', 'corrections_applied': \[\]}
**followup status:** checked
**institutional response:** {'date': None, 'action_type': 'Conviction', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Trial court (as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment)', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation', 'source': 'Crl.A. No. 129/2003', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}; {'date': '2011-09-30', 'action_type': 'Order issued', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Delhi High Court', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card)', 'source': 'Crl.A. No. 129/2003', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}
**last checked:** 2026-09-19
**link checked per url:** {'url': 'https://indiankanoon.org/doc/758733/', 'link_checked': None}; {'url': 'https://www.courtkutchehry.com/judgements/909322/satish-chander-appellant-hash-cbi-respondent/', 'link_checked': None}
**retracted:** {"is_retracted": false}
**service:** police
**source assessment:** {"established": null, "basis": null}
**status:** current
**subcategory display:** bribery pc act
**tier:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**tier badge:** Externally reported
**tier history:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**verdict:** accept
**verdict note:** HC judgment verified; PC Act conviction of Delhi Police SI sustained, appeal dismissed.
**verification badge:** V2 · Externally reported
**verification status:** V2
**watch:** babuwatch

Status: Conviction upheld.

[Open CW-2011-0041](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2011-0041)