# \[name withheld\] vs The Deputy Inspector General of Police and Another

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2018-0024](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2018-0024)

## Report card

By judgment dated 20 June 2018 in W.P. No.9589 of 2015, the Madras High Court (Coram: V. Parthiban, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Sub-Inspector of Police, Trichy Range, Tamil Nadu Police.

- Register number: TN 00 CW 0003
- Case reference: W.P. No.9589 of 2015
- Court and date: Madras High Court (Coram: V. Parthiban, J.), 20 June 2018
- Officer(s) at the material time: Sub-Inspector of Police, Trichy Range, Tamil Nadu Police
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract): “Since this Court is of the considered view that the proved corruption cannot be condoned under any circumstances and therefore dismissal order cannot even be remotely held to be disproportionate.” (at para 14)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings: No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/119618751/); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2018-0024)

**Record:** CW-2018-0024 (compiler id CWC-0851); case GAP2-39-013
**Title:** \[name withheld\] vs The Deputy Inspector General of Police and Another
**Court:** Madras High Court; judges: V. Parthiban
**Case number / citation:** W.P. No.9589 of 2015
**Judgment:** 2018-06-20 (2018, day precision)
**Incident date:** 2001-01-01 (2001)
**Place:** Tamil Nadu; police station or unit: Trichy Range, Tamil Nadu Police; force: state_police
**Category:** Bribery & extortion
**Sub-category:** bribery pc act
**Outcome:** Disciplinary action upheld (disciplinary_upheld)
**Sections:** PC Act 1988 s.7
**Officers (gated display forms):** Sub-Inspector of Police, Trichy Range, Tamil Nadu Police (1 in record)
**Victims:** Not stated (0 in record)
**Sentence / compensation:** dismissal
**Sentence type:** dismissal (dismissal)

conviction was not 'in 2001' — 2001 is trap/suspension year (para 3-4); conviction pre-dates May-2008 show-cause with Crl. appeal C.A.No.343/2008 (paras 5-6), confirmed with SLP rejected 21.08.2012 (para 7)

> Since this Court is of the considered view that the proved corruption cannot be condoned under any circumstances and therefore dismissal order cannot even be remotely held to be disproportionate.

**Sources (2):** [indiankanoon.org](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/119618751/); [barandbench.com](https://www.barandbench.com/news/the-yearly-reports-madras-high-court-in-2018)
**Verification:** V2 · Externally reported
**Review:** Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded
**admin category:** corruption
**admin subcategory:** bribery_pc_act
**allegations:** {'category': 'Other', 'primary': True, 'position': 'Material fact supported', 'position_explainer': 'Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.', 'official_finding_relation': 'supports allegation'}
**anonymised:** False
**court quote para:** 14
**display title redacted:** \[name withheld\] vs The Deputy Inspector General of Police and Another
**followup history:** {'date': '2026-09-19', 'scope': 'Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass', 'method': 'skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)', 'result': 'wrong_facts', 'corrections_applied': \['summary'\]}
**followup status:** checked
**institutional response:** {'date': '2018-06-20', 'action_type': 'Order issued', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Madras High Court', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The Madras High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.', 'disposition': 'Disciplinary action · Procedural only', 'source': 'W.P. No.9589 of 2015', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}
**last checked:** 2026-09-19
**link checked per url:** {'url': 'https://indiankanoon.org/doc/119618751/', 'link_checked': None}; {'url': 'https://www.barandbench.com/news/the-yearly-reports-madras-high-court-in-2018', 'link_checked': None}
**retracted:** {"is_retracted": false}
**service:** police
**source assessment:** {"established": null, "basis": null}
**status:** current
**subcategory display:** bribery pc act
**tier:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**tier badge:** Externally reported
**tier history:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**verdict:** accept
**verdict note:** HC dismissed POCA-convicted SI plea; dismissal for bribery upheld, conversion to compulsory retirement refused.
**verification badge:** V2 · Externally reported
**verification status:** V2
**watch:** babuwatch

Status: Disciplinary action upheld.

[Open CW-2018-0024](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2018-0024)