# Delhi Police Woman Constable (DD Writer) vs Govt. of NCT and Others

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2026-0009](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2026-0009)

## Report card

By judgment dated 20 February 2026 in W.P.(C) 8707/2009, the Delhi High Court (Coram: Anil Kshetarpal, Amit Mahajan, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Woman Constable (DD Writer), Police Station New Ashok Nagar, Delhi Police.

- Register number: DL 07 CW 0021
- Case reference: W.P.(C) 8707/2009
- Court and date: Delhi High Court (Coram: Anil Kshetarpal, Amit Mahajan, JJ.), 20 February 2026
- Officer(s) at the material time: Woman Constable (DD Writer), Police Station New Ashok Nagar, Delhi Police
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract): “This chain of concurrent factual determinations, based on oral, documentary and electronic material disclosed to the Petitioner, does not convince this Court that it is a case of no evidence or there has been a violation of natural justice.” (at para 19)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings: The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://rawlaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/RAJNI.pdf); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2026-0009)

**Record:** CW-2026-0009 (compiler id CWC-0124); case DELHI-033
**Title:** Delhi Police Woman Constable (DD Writer) vs Govt. of NCT and Others
**Court:** Delhi High Court; judges: Anil Kshetarpal; Amit Mahajan
**Case number / citation:** W.P.(C) 8707/2009
**Judgment:** 2026-02-20 (2026, day precision)
**Incident date:** 2005-09-06 (2005)
**Place:** East Delhi, Delhi; city town: New Ashok Nagar; police station or unit: Police Station New Ashok Nagar, Delhi Police; force: state_police
**Category:** Bribery & extortion
**Sub-category:** bribery pc act
**Outcome:** Disciplinary action upheld (disciplinary_upheld)
**Officers (gated display forms):** Woman Constable (DD Writer), Police Station New Ashok Nagar, Delhi Police (1 in record)
**Victims:** New Ashok Nagar man (1 in record)
**Sentence / compensation:** dismissal
**Sentence type:** dismissal (dismissal)

The Delhi High Court dismissed Woman Constable's writ and upheld her dismissal for corruption caught in a TV sting. Posted as DD Writer at PS New Ashok Nagar, she demanded Rs 200 and accepted Rs 150 from decoy \[name withheld\] to register an NCR for a lost phone on 6 September 2005; the concealed-camera footage was telecast on Star News' Sansani programme. A joint departmental enquiry with Duty Officer HC relied on the video-CD plus duty records and departmental witnesses to hold her guilty. The Court held the sting video was cogent material, non-examination of the decoy not fatal, and concurrent findings of four fora neither perverse nor arbitrary. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

> This chain of concurrent factual determinations, based on oral, documentary and electronic material disclosed to the Petitioner, does not convince this Court that it is a case of no evidence or there has been a violation of natural justice.

**Sources (2):** [rawlaw.in](https://rawlaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/RAJNI.pdf); [rawlaw.in](https://rawlaw.in/delhi-high-court-sting-operation-video-sufficient-in-departmental-inquiry-non-examination-of-decoy-not-fatal-woman-constables-dismissal-for-corruption-upheld/)
**Verification:** V2 · Externally reported
**Review:** Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded
**admin category:** corruption
**admin subcategory:** bribery_pc_act
**allegations:** {'category': 'Other', 'primary': True, 'position': 'Material fact supported', 'position_explainer': 'Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.', 'official_finding_relation': 'supports allegation'}
**anonymised:** False
**court quote para:** 19
**display title redacted:** Delhi Police Woman Constable (DD Writer) vs Govt. of NCT and Others
**followup history:** {'date': '2026-09-19', 'scope': 'Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass', 'method': 'skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)', 'result': 'wrong_facts', 'corrections_applied': \['court_quote', 'court_quote_para'\]}
**followup status:** checked
**institutional response:** {'date': '2026-02-20', 'action_type': 'Order issued', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Delhi High Court', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The Delhi High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.', 'disposition': 'Disciplinary action · Procedural only', 'source': 'W.P.(C) 8707/2009', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}
**last checked:** 2026-09-19
**link checked per url:** {'url': 'https://rawlaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/RAJNI.pdf', 'link_checked': None}; {'url': 'https://rawlaw.in/delhi-high-court-sting-operation-video-sufficient-in-departmental-inquiry-non-examination-of-decoy-not-fatal-woman-constables-dismissal-for-corruption-upheld/', 'link_checked': None}
**retracted:** {"is_retracted": false}
**service:** police
**source assessment:** {"established": null, "basis": null}
**status:** current
**subcategory display:** bribery pc act
**tier:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**tier badge:** Externally reported
**tier history:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**verdict:** accept
**verdict note:** Sting-video bribery dismissal upheld; decoy non-examination held not fatal.
**verification badge:** V2 · Externally reported
**verification status:** V2
**watch:** babuwatch

Status: Disciplinary action upheld.

[Open CW-2026-0009](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2026-0009)
