# Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector vs C.B.I.

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2026-0020](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2026-0020)

## Report card

By judgment dated 5 May 2026 in CRL.A. 1063/2006, the Delhi High Court (Coram: Chandrasekharan Sudha, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Assistant Sub-Inspector, Special Branch.

- Register number: DL 00 CW 0032
- Case reference: CRL.A. 1063/2006
- Court and date: Delhi High Court (Coram: Chandrasekharan Sudha, J.), 5 May 2026
- Officer(s) at the material time: Assistant Sub-Inspector, Special Branch
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 13(1)(d)(ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract): “Therefore, it is apparent that a false report had been given by A1 on the basis of which the passport was issued. Therefore, the offence under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) of the PC Act is clearly made out.” (at para 22)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 2 years.
- Present status of the proceedings: The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/55192143/); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2026-0020)

**Record:** CW-2026-0020 (compiler id CWC-0114); case DELHI-023; aliases: CWC-0585
**Title:** Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector vs C.B.I.
**Court:** Delhi High Court; judges: Chandrasekharan Sudha
**Case number / citation:** CRL.A. 1063/2006
**Judgment:** 2026-05-05 (2026, day precision)
**Incident date:** 1993-01-01 (1993)
**Place:** Delhi, Delhi; police station or unit: Special Branch; force: state_police
**Category:** Other misconduct
**Sub-category:** other
**Outcome:** Conviction upheld (conviction_upheld)
**Sections:** IPC 120-B; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d)(ii); PC Act 1988 s.13(2)
**Officers (gated display forms):** Assistant Sub-Inspector, Special Branch (1 in record)
**Victims:** Not stated (0 in record)
**Sentence / compensation:** mixed; max 2 yrs
**Sentence type:** mixed (mixed)

The Delhi High Court dismissed ex-ASI \[name withheld\]'s appeal and upheld his CBI-court conviction for false passport verification reports. Posted in the Special Branch in 1993 and tasked with detailed police verification of two applicants' personal particular forms, he prepared and submitted false reports certifying fictitious addresses as genuine, pursuant to which passports were issued on forged ration cards. Relying on residents and a postman who testified that no such persons lived at the addresses and no verification was conducted there, the Court held a false report had plainly been given and conspiracy inferable. It sustained one year's RI (Section 120-B) and two years' RI (Section 13(1)(d)(ii)/13(2) PC Act) with fines, concurrently. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

> Therefore, it is apparent that a false report had been given by A1 on the basis of which the passport was issued. Therefore, the offence under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) of the PC Act is clearly made out.

**Sources (3):** [indiankanoon.org](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/55192143/); [livelaw.in](https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-upholds-conviction-of-ex-cop-in-33-year-old-fake-passport-verification-case-533161); [livelaw.in](https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/2026/05/06/76005052026crla10632006123632-672221.pdf)
**Verification:** V2 · Externally reported
**Review:** Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded
**admin category:** corruption
**admin subcategory:** other
**allegations:** {'category': 'Other', 'primary': True, 'position': 'Material fact supported', 'position_explainer': 'Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.', 'official_finding_relation': 'supports allegation'}
**anonymised:** False
**court quote para:** 22
**display title redacted:** Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector vs C.B.I.
**followup history:** {'date': '2026-09-19', 'scope': 'Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass', 'method': 'skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl)', 'result': 'holds', 'corrections_applied': \[\]}
**followup status:** checked
**institutional response:** {'date': None, 'action_type': 'Conviction', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Trial court (as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment)', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation', 'source': 'CRL.A. 1063/2006', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}; {'date': '2026-05-05', 'action_type': 'Order issued', 'status': 'Concluded', 'authority': 'Delhi High Court', 'independence': 'External', 'legal_effect': 'Binding', 'description': 'The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.', 'disposition': 'Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card)', 'source': 'CRL.A. 1063/2006', 'recheck': 'Not yet re-checked.'}
**last checked:** 2026-09-19
**link checked per url:** {'url': 'https://indiankanoon.org/doc/55192143/', 'link_checked': None}; {'url': 'https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-upholds-conviction-of-ex-cop-in-33-year-old-fake-passport-verification-case-533161', 'link_checked': None}; {'url': 'https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/2026/05/06/76005052026crla10632006123632-672221.pdf', 'link_checked': None}
**retracted:** {"is_retracted": false}
**service:** police
**source assessment:** {"established": null, "basis": null}
**status:** current
**subcategory display:** other
**tier:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**tier badge:** Externally reported
**tier history:** Tier A — Externally reported or officially recorded
**verdict:** accept
**verdict note:** Delhi HC judgment verified on Indian Kanoon; PC Act + 120-B conviction upheld, appeal dismissed.
**verification badge:** V2 · Externally reported
**verification status:** V2
**watch:** babuwatch

Status: Conviction upheld.

[Open CW-2026-0020](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/incident/CW-2026-0020)