# State v. Haryana Police not stated (Haryana Police personnel; Personal Security Officer to the judge; in service since 2007)

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2-07-010](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2-07-010)
Record JSON: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/data/case/t2-07-010.json](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/data/case/t2-07-010.json)

Trial-court conviction (Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram (Judge Sudheer Parmar); Sessions Court). Convicted 6 February 2020. Appeal status: Appeal pending.

## Summary

Additional Sessions Judge Sudheer Parmar, Gurugram, on 7 February 2020 (reported 8 February 2020) awarded the death sentence to Haryana Police PSO \[name withheld\] for shooting dead the wife and son of a Gurugram Additional Sessions Judge, in Arcadia market Gurugram on 13 October 2018 following an altercation over car keys. The court relied on the accused's extra-judicial confession and the dying declaration of a Gurugram woman, rejecting the spur-of-the-moment leniency plea given his gross misuse of a security-duty position. Confirmation/appeal posture unknown.

## Report card

By judgment dated 6 February 2020, the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram (Judge Sudheer Parmar) convicted the not stated (Haryana Police personnel; Personal Security Officer to the judge; in service since 2007), Haryana Police (PSO to Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram).

- Register number: HR 26 CW 0004
- Case reference: Session Case No. 82 of 2019 (CNR HRGR01-000512-2019)
- Court and date: The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram (Judge Sudheer Parmar), 6 February 2020
- Officer(s) at the material time: not stated (Haryana Police personnel; Personal Security Officer to the judge; in service since 2007), Haryana Police (PSO to Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram)
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; the Arms Act, 1959
- Finding of the Court (extract): “When a protector turns into a predator and misuses his position and utilizes his service revolver to commit a crime, his actions are proof that he is beyond reform and a threat to society at large. Thus, the accused deserves …”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Death penalty (rarest-of-rare reasoning; subject to High Court confirmation — outcome unknown)
- Present status of the proceedings: An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/pdf_upload-370004.pdf); [Appellate judgment](https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/law-order/3615534-supreme-court-halts-execution-of-gurugram-convict); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2-07-010)

## At a glance

- Category: Other misconduct
- Sub-category: other
- Location: Gurugram, Haryana
- Officers: not stated (Haryana Police personnel; Personal Security Officer to the judge; in service since 2007), Haryana Police (PSO to Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram)
- Sentence: Death penalty (rarest-of-rare reasoning; subject to High Court confirmation — outcome unknown)
- Verification: V2 · Trial court