# CBI vs Delhi Police Sub-Inspector

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2-15-005](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2-15-005)
Record JSON: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/data/case/t2-15-005.json](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/data/case/t2-15-005.json)

Trial-court conviction (District & Sessions Judge (East) / Special Judge (CBI), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (Shri Talwant Singh); CBI Court). Convicted 7 October 2015. Appeal status: No appeal known.

## Summary

Special Judge (CBI) Karkardooma convicted Delhi Policewoman Sub-Inspector, IO of rape case FIR 88/2012 at PS Mandawali, for demanding Rs 1,00,000 (scaled to Rs 40,000 in verification) from complainant \[name withheld\] to save his grandson in that case, with her son \[name withheld\] collecting the tainted bribe in the CBI trap. Both were held guilty of conspiracy; \[name withheld\] was further convicted under sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. She was sentenced to concurrent rigorous imprisonment up to three years with Rs 60,000 total fine.

## Report card

By judgment dated 7 October 2015, the District & Sessions Judge (East) / Special Judge (CBI), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (Shri Talwant Singh) convicted the Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, PS Mandawali (Investigating Officer in FIR 88/2012).

- Register number: DL 07 CW 0014
- Case reference: AC No. 03/2012, RC No. 17/2012 CBI/ACB/Delhi
- Court and date: The District & Sessions Judge (East) / Special Judge (CBI), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (Shri Talwant Singh), 7 October 2015
- Officer(s) at the material time: Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, PS Mandawali (Investigating Officer in FIR 88/2012)
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, read with Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract): “Accordingly both the accused are found guilty for offence under Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code read with Section 7 & Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: \[name withheld\]: 1 yr RI+Rs 10,000 (120B r/w s.13), 3 yr RI+Rs 25,000 (s.7), 3 yr RI+Rs 25,000 (s.13), concurrent. Co-convict Rahul (civilian son): 1 yr RI+Rs 10,000. Section 428 benefit given
- Present status of the proceedings: No appeal is known from the cited sources.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/61240466/); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2-15-005)

## At a glance

- Category: Bribery & extortion
- Sub-category: bribery pc act
- Location: East Delhi, Delhi
- Officers: Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, PS Mandawali (Investigating Officer in FIR 88/2012)
- Sentence: \[name withheld\]: 1 yr RI+Rs 10,000 (120B r/w s.13), 3 yr RI+Rs 25,000 (s.7), 3 yr RI+Rs 25,000 (s.13), concurrent. Co-convict Rahul (civilian son): 1 yr RI+Rs 10,000. Section 428 benefit given.
- Verification: V1 · Trial court