# CBI v. Delhi Police Sub-Inspector

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2w2-10-009](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2w2-10-009)
Record JSON: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/data/case/t2w2-10-009.json](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/data/case/t2w2-10-009.json)

Trial-court conviction (Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (2003; Rouse Avenue Courts did not exist then); CBI Court). Convicted 21 August 2003. Appeal status: Upheld on appeal.

## Summary

The Special Judge, Tis Hazari convicted SI of PS Jama Masjid in CC No.57/1996 for demanding Rs 5,000 illegal gratification on 25.09.1995 from PW1 for not taking adverse action against him in fake-university-degrees Crime No.187/95 which he was investigating, with the CBI recovering tainted Rs 4,000 at Tis Hazari Courts from a head constable who took it at the SI's instance (complaint 06.10.1995), holding him guilty on 21.08.2003 under sections 7 and 13 of the PC Act, 1947. He was sentenced to four years RI with Rs 500 fine under each provision. On 02.02.2026 Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha dismissed his appeal (CRL.A. 733/2002). (Row merged in Pass 1-resume with ex-029, an internal duplicate.)

## Report card

By judgment dated 21 August 2003, the Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (2003; Rouse Avenue Courts did not exist then) convicted the Sub-Inspector, PS Jama Masjid, Delhi Police.

- Register number: DL 06 CW 0008
- Case reference: CC No.57/1996; RC No.86(A)/95-DLI; CRL.A. 733/2002
- Court and date: The Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (2003; Rouse Avenue Courts did not exist then), 21 August 2003
- Officer(s) at the material time: Sub-Inspector, PS Jama Masjid, Delhi Police
- Present service status: Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked: Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947
- Finding of the Court (extract): “I do not find any reason to disbelieve the prosecution case. Hence, I find no infirmity in the impugned judgement calling for an interference by this court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 4 years RI + Rs 500 fine under each provision (3 months RI in default)
- Present status of the proceedings: The conviction was affirmed in appeal.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/76002022026crla7332002105024-653740.pdf); [Appellate judgment](https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-upholds-conviction-of-police-sub-inspector-in-1995-cbi-bribery-trap-case-521774); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2w2-10-009)

## At a glance

- Category: Bribery & extortion
- Sub-category: bribery pc act
- Location: Central Delhi, Delhi
- Officers: Sub-Inspector, PS Jama Masjid, Delhi Police
- Sentence: 4 years RI + Rs 500 fine under each provision (3 months RI in default)
- Verification: V1 · Trial court