# CBI v. Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector (Investigating Officer)

HTML version: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2w2-10-075](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2w2-10-075)
Record JSON: [https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/data/case/t2w2-10-075.json](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/data/case/t2w2-10-075.json)

Trial-court conviction (Court of Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi; CBI Court). Convicted 11 February 2003. Appeal status: Upheld on appeal.

## Summary

The Special Judge, Tis Hazari convicted ASI in CC 26/97 (RC 72(A)/96) for demanding Rs 2,000 from complainant \[name withheld\] - warning it be paid by 5 pm on 21.09.1996 failing which he would face serious trouble in FIR 645/1996 (ss.308/323/34 IPC, PS Gokul Puri) which \[name withheld\] was investigating - catching him in a CBI ACB trap the same day with the tainted Rs 2,000 recovered from his right pant pocket, holding him guilty on 11.02.2003 under sections 7 and 13 of the PC Act. He was sentenced on 13.02.2003. On 21.04.2011 Justice Rajiv Shakdher dismissed his appeal (CRL.A. 113/2003, (2011) 179 DLT 664), sustaining the conviction and sentence and ordering him taken into custody; he was dismissed from service on 18.08.2011. (The CAT's 09.08.2016 order misprints the trial year as 2013; the High Court confirms 2003.)

## Report card

By judgment dated 11 February 2003, the Court of Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi convicted the Assistant Sub-Inspector (Investigating Officer), Delhi Police (IO of FIR 645/1996, PS Gokul Puri).

- Register number: DL 05 CW 0002
- Case reference: CC No.26/97; RC No.72(A)/96/CBI/ACB/New Delhi; CRL.A. 113/2003 (Delhi High Court)
- Court and date: The Court of Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, 11 February 2003
- Officer(s) at the material time: Assistant Sub-Inspector (Investigating Officer), Delhi Police (IO of FIR 645/1996, PS Gokul Puri)
- Present service status: Recorded in the cited sources as dismissed from service.
- Provisions invoked: Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract): “Resultantly, the impugned judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court is sustained. The appeal is thus dismissed.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum: Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Quantum not stated in appellate judgment or CAT order (sentence order 13.02.2003; sustained on appeal)
- Present status of the proceedings: The conviction was affirmed in appeal.
- Source orders: [Judgment / order (primary source)](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1136707/); [Appellate judgment](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1136707/); [Permanent link to this record](https://datalibertarian.in/babuwatch/trial-court/t2w2-10-075)

## At a glance

- Category: Bribery & extortion
- Sub-category: bribery pc act
- Location: North East Delhi, Delhi
- Officers: Assistant Sub-Inspector (Investigating Officer), Delhi Police (IO of FIR 645/1996, PS Gokul Puri)
- Sentence: Quantum not stated in appellate judgment or CAT order (sentence order 13.02.2003; sustained on appeal)
- Verification: V2 · Trial court