No public servant is above the law.

Babuwatch documents 2,443 court-adjudicated records against public servants — 522 civil servants and 1,921 police records, from 1168 Supreme Court / High Court judgments and 1275 trial-court convictions across India — each one attributed to the court that decided it.

A public record, not a complaints service. Findings are the courts’; names are withheld unless the naming gate clears them.

What Babuwatch does

One register of what the courts decided about public servants

Record

We record convictions and adverse court findings against public servants of every government in India — Union, state and local — and cite the court and the source for each one.

Attribute

Every finding belongs to the court that made it. We add no findings of our own, and we say plainly how far each record has been verified.

Follow up

Trial convictions can be appealed. Each record shows its appeal status as known from the sources, and convictions later set aside leave the counts.

Protect

Names are withheld unless a two-key naming gate clears them. Complainants, victims, witnesses and minors are never named.

One register covers every public servant — police officers and civil servants of departments, municipal bodies and other government offices alike. Every record passes the same verification and naming rules, whatever the service.

Read the methodology →
Tracker

Court-adjudicated cases, with verification and findings kept distinct

2,443 published records (1168 High Court / Supreme Court · 1275 trial court) from 34 states and union territories. Each record attributes its findings to the court it cites; Babuwatch adds no findings of its own. A further 22 trial-court convictions later set aside on appeal are kept out of the counts.

Records document court-adjudicated cases. Findings are attributed to the deciding court; verification describes how the source was reviewed. Read our methodology →
Violence & unlawful detentionAdverse findingV2
GJ 03 CW 0005

Rajkot Man vs State of Gujarat & Anr.

28 September 2026 · Rajkot, Gujarat

The High Court recorded that a Joint Director General of Foreign Trade at Rajkot, arrested by the CBI in a bribery trap on 24.03.2023, was kept in his office overnight while the post-trap panchnama continued, and died on the morning of 25.03.2023 after, as a CBI constable reported, jumping from a window. Rajkot's…

Read the court record
Violence & unlawful detentionAdverse findingV2
DL 05 CW 0024

North East Man vs The State NCT of Delhi

25 September 2026 · North East, Delhi

The High Court recorded that a man arrested in an FIR at New Usmanpur police station was released by a Karkardooma magistrate on 23.07.2026 because the grounds of arrest supplied to him bore no date or time and gave no details of the incident, as the Supreme Court requires in Mihir Rajesh Shah. Police re-arrested him…

Read the court record
Violence & unlawful detentionCompensation orderedV2
UP 96 CW 0001

Chitrakoot Man And Another vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others

23 September 2026 · Chitrakoot, Uttar Pradesh

The High Court recorded that a sand-mining businessman, accused in a cheating and breach-of-trust FIR arising from what the informant himself called a civil dispute, was brought into P.S. Sardhuwa, Chitrakoot at 9:00 a.m. on 13.07.2026, taken out at 10:19 a.m. in the informant's vehicle accompanied by the…

Read the court record

Records are updated as new information, appeals, or court findings emerge. Recent convictions may still be under appeal.

View all records
Verification and court outcome are separate
V0
Unreviewed
Received as an internal lead
V1
Provenance checked
Basic source questions examined
V2
Attributable record
Qualifying public source reviewed
V3
Material fact corroborated
Independent support is recorded
Every published card shows its verification level, and what each level means is set out in the methodology. Trial-court convictions publish at V1 and above; unreviewed leads never appear.
Patterns dashboard

The record shows shape, not just single cases

Live counts drawn from 2,443 published records show where adjudicated cases occur, how facts were verified, and what the courts decided.

Live dataset

The dashboard uses only published court-adjudicated records. It describes the cases documented here; it does not estimate how common misconduct is across India.

Explore the patterns
Seek a remedy

If this has happened to you or someone you know

Lawful routes

There are lawful routes, and free legal aid is a right for everyone who qualifies. Corruption by a public servant is reported to the authorities — your state’s Anti-Corruption Bureau or Vigilance department, the Lokayukta where one exists, the Central Bureau of Investigation for Union government employees, or the Central Vigilance Commission — and harm or unlawful detention can go to the courts and the human rights commissions. Take the sources on any record to a lawyer and keep copies of every complaint. Babuwatch itself is a record, not a complaints desk: contacting us does not notify any authority or begin any case.

Who gets free legal aid

Under Section 12 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, free legal services are available to anyone who has to file or defend a case and is: a woman or a child; a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe; a person with a disability; a victim of trafficking or forced labour; a victim of a mass disaster, ethnic or caste violence, flood, drought, earthquake or industrial disaster; an industrial workman; a person in custody; or a person whose annual income is below ₹3 lakh, or the higher limit set by their state. Apply in writing or in person at the District Legal Services Authority or Taluka Legal Services Committee, or call the national legal-aid helpline 15100. Read NALSA’s eligibility guidance, and check your State Legal Services Authority for its own income limit.