Trial-court conviction
bx-r6-mp-lokayukta-07-005Bhopal (court city; posting Jabalpur as printed), Madhya PradeshConvicted 15 April 2004

Crime No. 46/02

The Madhya Pradesh Lokayukta's list of decisions records that the Special Court, Bhopal (as printed: माननीय विशेष न्यायालय भोपाल) convicted a Sanchalak (Director), Rozgar evam Prashikshan, Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur, Employment and Training Department, Madhya Pradesh (as printed: संचालक, रोजगार एवं प्रशिक्षण, म.प्र. जबलपुर), Bhopal district, on 15 April 2004 (Crime No. 46/02). The conviction was for bribery, under Section 7, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The sentence recorded is: two years imprisonment and fine under Section 7; two years imprisonment and fine under Sections 13(1)(d)/13(2); fine: Rs.5,000 + Rs.5,000. This is the agency's account of the court's decision; the official's name is withheld, and any later appeal is not reflected unless noted. Verification level V1: the name and conviction wording are matched in the source entry, but the date or case number shown is as extracted from the entry and was not matched in the cited passage.

Trial-court convictionV1
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Special Court, Bhopal (as printed: माननीय विशेष न्यायालय भोपाल) convicted the accused public servant on 15 April 2004. No appeal is known from the cited sources.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: two years imprisonment and fine under Section 7; two years imprisonment and fine under Sections 13(1)(d)/13(2); fine: Rs.5,000 + Rs.5,000

Sections: Section 7, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Appeal status

No appeal known.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.