18 Aug 1958
Order issued
ConcludedThe Madhya Bharat High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: AIR 1959 MP 43; (1959) 2 LLJ 187; 1959 MPLJ 423
Not yet re-checked.
CW-1958-0002Guna, Madhya PradeshJudgment 18 August 1958
Madhya Bharat Police Sub-Inspector v. State of Madhya Bharat
The Madhya Bharat High Court (now Madhya Pradesh High Court) dismissed the Article 226 petition of Sub-Inspector of Guna district, sustaining his dismissal from service of 2 June 1953. The SP Guna had enquired into 18 counts of corruption and bribery and recommended dismissal, which the DIG Northern Range imposed after accepting findings on 7 charges; the IG had dismissed the departmental appeal. The Court held the DIG competent after the 1948 merger, found no violation of Article 311(1) and no fatal inquiry defect, and dismissed the application with costs. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 18 August 1958, the Madhya Bharat High Court (Coram: H.R. Krishnan, A.H. Khan, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Sub-Inspector, Guna district, Madhya Bharat Police.
- Register number
- MP 08 CW 0001
- Case reference
- AIR 1959 MP 43; (1959) 2 LLJ 187; 1959 MPLJ 423
- Court and date
- Madhya Bharat High Court (Coram: H.R. Krishnan, A.H. Khan, JJ.), 18 August 1958
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Sub-Inspector, Guna district, Madhya Bharat Police
- Present service status
- Recorded in the cited sources as dismissed from service.
- Provisions invoked
- Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The result is that the application is without force. The rulings reported in AIR 1956 Madh-B. 259 and AIR 1957 MP 128, the principles of which, I accept, have no application to the present case.” (at para 16)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Madhya Bharat High Court judgment dated 18 August 1958 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“The result is that the application is without force. The rulings reported in AIR 1956 Madh-B. 259 and AIR 1957 MP 128, the principles of which, I accept, have no application to the present case.” (para 16)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.