CW-1970-0002Bulandshahr, Uttar PradeshJudgment 14 July 1970

Shikarpur Police Constable vs State of U.P.

The judgment of the Allahabad High Court records the following account. The appellant, a constable at Police Station Shikarpur, Bulandshahr, was charged with other constables under section 7 of the Police Act for arresting a Shikarpur man on 10 April 1959, fracturing his legs, and concealing it with a false general-diary report. The Superintendent of Police dismissed him on 29 June 1959 after a departmental enquiry; his departmental appeal and revision failed, as did his civil suit in first appeal. The Court held the enquiry by the authorised Deputy Superintendent of Police was competent under the Police Regulations and the dismissal procedure valid. The Court dismissed the second appeal with costs, leaving the dismissal standing. No criminal prosecution outcome is recorded in this judgment. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 14 July 1970 in Second Appeal No. 323 of 1964, the Allahabad High Court (Coram: M.N. Shukla, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Constable, Police Station Shikarpur, Bulandshahr.

Register number
UP 13 CW 0001
Case reference
Second Appeal No. 323 of 1964 / AIR 1971 All 210
Court and date
Allahabad High Court (Coram: M.N. Shukla, J.), 14 July 1970
Officer(s) at the material time
Constable, Police Station Shikarpur, Bulandshahr
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 7 of the Police Act, 1861
Finding of the Court (extract)
“He along with some other constables was charged u/s 7 of the Police Act for arresting a Shikarpur man on 10-4-1959 causing fracture on his legs and concealing the cause thereof by making a false report in the general diary.” (at para 2)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Allahabad High Court judgment dated 14 July 1970 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial torturePrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“He along with some other constables was charged u/s 7 of the Police Act for arresting a Shikarpur man on 10-4-1959 causing fracture on his legs and concealing the cause thereof by making a false report in the general diary.” (para 2)

Institutional response

1
14 Jul 1970

Order issued

Concluded
Allahabad High Court External · Binding

The Allahabad High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.

Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: AIR 1971 All 210
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.