CW-1998-0008Bhagalpur, BiharJudgment 10 February 1998

B.K. Pandey, Vth Additional District & Sessions Judge vs A. Natrajan, Superintendent of Police and Others

The judgment of the Patna High Court records the following account. On 18 November 1997, aggrieved by the arrest of a fellow Sub-Inspector, a group of Bhagalpur policemen attacked the 1st Additional District Judge inside his courtroom and chambers. The Patna High Court held that nine identified police officials, led by ringleader [name withheld], were guilty of criminal contempt on the affidavits, identification evidence and the DGP's inquiry report. The court rejected their apologies as undeserved given the gravity of assaulting a judge, sentencing Choudhary to three months' simple imprisonment and the other eight to two months each. It directed the State to secure the civil courts and left departmental, commission and criminal proceedings unaffected. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 10 February 1998 in Criminal contempt proceeding (with C.W.J.C. No. 10625 of 1997), the Patna High Court (Coram: N.N. Singh, N. Pandey, JJ.) recorded the conviction of 9 police personnel, namely: Officer-in-Charge, Kotwali Police Station, Bhagalpur; Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Assistant Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Station House Officer, Harijan Police Station, Bhagalpur; Sergeant Major, Bhagalpur Police.

Register number
BR 10 CW 0006
Case reference
Criminal contempt proceeding (with C.W.J.C. No. 10625 of 1997) / 1998(1) PLJR 650; 1998(2) BLJR 1125
Court and date
Patna High Court (Coram: N.N. Singh, N. Pandey, JJ.), 10 February 1998
Officer(s) at the material time
Officer-in-Charge, Kotwali Police Station, Bhagalpur; Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Assistant Sub-Inspector, Bhagalpur Police; Station House Officer, Harijan Police Station, Bhagalpur; Sergeant Major, Bhagalpur Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Section 17 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Since Shri [name withheld] (opposite party No. 3) has acted as 'ring leader' of the contemners in the entire incident and planned the episode with a view to humiliate and assault the A.D.J. 1st (a Bhagalpur man), he deserves a …” (at para 46)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction entered by High Court. Sentence: imprisonment; maximum substantive term of 0.25 years.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Patna High Court judgment dated 10 February 1998 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Since Shri [name withheld] (opposite party No. 3) has acted as 'ring leader' of the contemners in the entire incident and planned the episode with a view to humiliate and assault the A.D.J. 1st (a Bhagalpur man), he deserves a …” (para 46)

Institutional response

1
10 Feb 1998

Order issued

Concluded
Patna High Court External · Binding

The Patna High Court entered convictions against police personnel in this judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: 1998(1) PLJR 650; 1998(2) BLJR 1125
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.