CW-1999-0010Mumbai Suburban, MaharashtraJudgment 18 September 1999

Mumbai Police Police Officer and others vs State of Maharashtra

The judgment of the Bombay High Court records the following account. A Mumbai man, aged about 26, was tortured through the night of 27/28 June 1990 in the kachcha lock-up of Oshiwara Police Station by seven police officers, witnessed by co-detainees, and died of the injuries after admission to Bhagwati Hospital. The Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay acquitted the officers of culpable homicide under Section 304 IPC but convicted all seven under Section 330 IPC (3 years' RI for accused no. 1, 2 years' RI plus fine for the rest). The defence was total denial with a claim that kidnappers had assaulted Raju. The High Court dismissed the appeal, maintaining and confirming the convictions and sentences, remarking that the State should have appealed the Section 304 acquittal, and directed surrender within four weeks.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 18 September 1999, the Bombay High Court (Coram: D.G. Deshpande, J.) affirmed the conviction of 7 police personnel, namely: Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai.

Register number
MH 01 CW 0003
Case reference
2000(5) Bom CR 410
Court and date
Bombay High Court (Coram: D.G. Deshpande, J.), 18 September 1999
Officer(s) at the material time
Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai; Police Officer, Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 330 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The appeal is dismissed and the judgment of conviction and sentence of the trial Court against all the accused is maintained, confirmed and up held.” (at para 84)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment; maximum substantive term of 3 years.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Bombay High Court judgment dated 18 September 1999 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“The appeal is dismissed and the judgment of conviction and sentence of the trial Court against all the accused is maintained, confirmed and up held.” (para 84)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Bombay High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Bombay High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: 2000(5) Bom CR 410
Not yet re-checked.
18 Sep 1999

Order issued

Concluded
Bombay High Court External · Binding

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: 2000(5) Bom CR 410
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.