CW-2000-0004Didwana-Kuchaman, RajasthanJudgment 15 May 2000

Kuchaman City Man vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

The Jaipur Bench of the Rajasthan High Court allowed an Article 226 writ petition filed by Mst. Madina, the 23-year-old widow of a Kuchaman City man, who died in police custody within three hours of being detained on 17 June 1997 for alleged theft of a guar gum bag. The post-mortem examination revealed that a Kuchaman City man died from haemorrhagic shock resulting from kidney injuries sustained through third-degree torture at Kuchaman City Police Station. Rejecting the State argument that disputed facts barred writ jurisdiction, the Court held that the custodial death was undisputed on record and directed the State of Rajasthan to pay Rs. 3,00,000 as interim compensation to the widow and four minor children, with directions to recover the amount proportionately from the erring police officers. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 15 May 2000, the Rajasthan High Court (Coram: B.J. Shethna, J.) returned findings adverse to 5 police personnel, namely: Station House Officer, Kuchaman City Police Station; Constable, Kuchaman City Police Station; Constable, Kuchaman City Police Station; Constable, Kuchaman City Police Station; Constable, Kuchaman City Police Station, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 3 lakh (Rs 3,00,000).

Register number
RJ 37 CW 0001
Case reference
2000 Cri LJ 4484
Court and date
Rajasthan High Court (Coram: B.J. Shethna, J.), 15 May 2000
Officer(s) at the material time
Station House Officer, Kuchaman City Police Station; Constable, Kuchaman City Police Station; Constable, Kuchaman City Police Station; Constable, Kuchaman City Police Station; Constable, Kuchaman City Police Station
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 226 of the Constitution of India; Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“In the light of the aforesaid, there cannot be any difficulty in coming to the prima facie conclusion that the death of a Kuchaman City man was caused by the police in its custody.” (at para 7)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 3 lakh (Rs 3,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Rajasthan High Court judgment dated 15 May 2000 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“In the light of the aforesaid, there cannot be any difficulty in coming to the prima facie conclusion that the death of a Kuchaman City man was caused by the police in its custody.” (para 7)

Institutional response

1
15 May 2000

Order issued

Concluded
Rajasthan High Court External · Binding

The Rajasthan High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 300,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: 2000 Cri LJ 4484
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.