Order issued
ConcludedThe Jammu and Kashmir High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 150,000.
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court disposed of a 1995 habeas corpus petition concerning a Srinagar man, picked up by the 41st Bn BSF on 09.07.1995 during a Maharaja Gunj crackdown and booked at Police Station CIK, thereafter untraceable. Adopting the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Srinagar) enquiry, the court disbelieved both the BSF escape story and the State's denial of custody. It held the subject disappeared while in the physical custody of respondent No. 3 (SP, CID-CIK), termed him the main and chief culprit, and awarded Rs 1.5 lakh compensation with liberty to recover from the responsible officers. It also ordered registration of a criminal case and time-bound investigation. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 14 May 2002 in Misc. Petition No. 197 of 1995 (u/s 491 CrPC), the Jammu and Kashmir High Court (Coram: Syed Bashir-Ud-Din, J.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Superintendent of Police, CID, Counter-Insurgency Kashmir (CIK), Srinagar; Police personnel, 41st Battalion, Border Security Force, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 1.5 lakh (Rs 1,50,000).
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court judgment dated 14 May 2002 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“The only conclusion to be drawn is that a Srinagar man has disappeared while in physical custody of the respondent No. 3, the main and chief culprit in the matter.” (para 9)
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 150,000.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.