CW-2002-0025Ujjain, Madhya PradeshJudgment 26 July 2002

Ujjain Man v. State of M.P. and Others

The Madhya Pradesh High Court (Dipak Misra J.) allowed in part a writ by 3.5-year-old Richa Jethani over the death of her father [name withheld], detained without formal arrest at Police Station Madhav Nagar, Ujjain from 29 February 2000 and found burnt at the station on the midnight of 2 March 2000. Commissioner and magisterial enquiries found criminal negligence: a privately purchased kerosene container and matchbox left accessible in the station enabled the death, and detention without arrest was illegal. The Court held the State vicariously liable under Article 21, awarded Rs 1 lakh compensation (Rs 80,000 in fixed deposit till the minor's majority), and left the State free to recover from the erring officials. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 26 July 2002 in Writ Petition No. 2693 of 2000 (J), the Madhya Pradesh High Court (Coram: Dipak Misra, J.) returned findings adverse to 5 police personnel, namely: Sub-Inspector (Officer-in-charge), Police Station Madhav Nagar, Ujjain; Constable, Police Station Madhav Nagar, Ujjain; Constable (Sentry), Police Station Madhav Nagar, Ujjain; City Superintendent of Police, Ujjain; Superintendent of Police, Ujjain, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 1 lakh (Rs 1,00,000).

Register number
MP 13 CW 0001
Case reference
Writ Petition No. 2693 of 2000 (J) / (2002) 07 MP CK 0067
Court and date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Coram: Dipak Misra, J.), 26 July 2002
Officer(s) at the material time
Sub-Inspector (Officer-in-charge), Police Station Madhav Nagar, Ujjain; Constable, Police Station Madhav Nagar, Ujjain; Constable (Sentry), Police Station Madhav Nagar, Ujjain; City Superintendent of Police, Ujjain; Superintendent of Police, Ujjain
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 21 of the Constitution of India; Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“On proper appreciation of the aforesaid report it rings as a bell that there was total unconcern, negligence and dereliction on the part of the concerned police officials as a result of which a Ujjain man could commit suicide.” (at para n/a)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 1 lakh (Rs 1,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment dated 26 July 2002 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“On proper appreciation of the aforesaid report it rings as a bell that there was total unconcern, negligence and dereliction on the part of the concerned police officials as a result of which a Ujjain man could commit suicide.” (para n/a)

Institutional response

1
26 Jul 2002

Order issued

Concluded
Madhya Pradesh High Court External · Binding

The Madhya Pradesh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 100,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: (2002) 07 MP CK 0067
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.