CW-2002-0026DelhiJudgment 31 July 2002

Delhi Police Head Constable vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

The Delhi High Court Division Bench (S.B. Sinha, C.J. and A.K. Sikri, J.) on 31 July 2002 dismissed the writ petitions of three Delhi Police PCR personnel and left intact their dismissal from service for extorting 35 pounds from a British-passport holder near IGI Airport on the night of 29/30 December 1996. The court held departmental proceedings require only preponderance of probability, not criminal-trial proof, and that the unavailable complainant's statement could be taken on record under Rule 16(iii) of the Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeals) Rules, 1980. It held the petitioners' undisputed presence on PCR duty at the site corroborated the extortion charge and found no illegality in the Tribunal's order. The dismissals ordered on 2 December 1998, affirmed on appeal and by the CAT, therefore stood.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 31 July 2002 in CWP Nos. 2537 and 2546 of 2001, the Delhi High Court (Coram: S.B. Sinha, A.K. Sikri, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against 3 police personnel, namely: Head Constable, PCR Van DL-1A-0407 (Z-28), Delhi Police; Head Constable, PCR Van DL-1A-0407 (Z-28), Delhi Police; Constable, PCR Van DL-1A-0407 (Z-28), Delhi Police.

Register number
DL 00 CW 0013
Case reference
CWP Nos. 2537 and 2546 of 2001 / (2002) 07 DEL CK 0066
Court and date
Delhi High Court (Coram: S.B. Sinha, A.K. Sikri, JJ.), 31 July 2002
Officer(s) at the material time
Head Constable, PCR Van DL-1A-0407 (Z-28), Delhi Police; Head Constable, PCR Van DL-1A-0407 (Z-28), Delhi Police; Constable, PCR Van DL-1A-0407 (Z-28), Delhi Police
Present service status
Recorded in the cited sources as dismissed from service.
Provisions invoked
Section 21 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978
Finding of the Court (extract)
“In the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any merit in these writ petitions, which are accordingly dismissed.” (at para 33)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Delhi High Court judgment dated 31 July 2002 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“In the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any merit in these writ petitions, which are accordingly dismissed.” (para 33)

Institutional response

1
31 Jul 2002

Order issued

Concluded
Delhi High Court External · Binding

The Delhi High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.

Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: (2002) 07 DEL CK 0066
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.