2 Nov 2006
Order issued
ConcludedThe Supreme Court of India entered convictions against police personnel in this judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: (2006) 8 SCC 693; AIR 2007 SC 163
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2006-0010Bhind, Madhya PradeshJudgment 2 November 2006
State of Madhya Pradesh vs Shambhu Dayal Nagar
Replace final sentence with the recorded defence: the respondent denied the charge, alleged false implication out of grudge (noting his cousin PW3 turned hostile), called the pocket-recovery story untenable, and pleaded leniency after ten years. Reword 'Lokayukta trap party' to 'a police trap party (Special Police Establishment)'. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 2 November 2006 in Appeal (Crl.) No. 261 of 2004, the Supreme Court of India (Coram: S.B. Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari, JJ.) recorded the conviction of the Shambhu Dayal Nagar (Assistant Sub-Inspector).
- Register number
- MP 30 CW 0002
- Case reference
- Appeal (Crl.) No. 261 of 2004 / (2006) 8 SCC 693; AIR 2007 SC 163
- Court and date
- Supreme Court of India (Coram: S.B. Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari, JJ.), 2 November 2006
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Shambhu Dayal Nagar (Assistant Sub-Inspector)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “the impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside and the judgment of the Special Judge is restored.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction entered by Supreme Court. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 1 year.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Supreme Court of India judgment dated 2 November 2006 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“the impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside and the judgment of the Special Judge is restored.”
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.