CW-2007-0007Vadodara, GujaratJudgment 3 May 2007

Premilaben R. Jaishwal and Ors. vs [name withheld] and Ors.

The Gujarat High Court held it established that a Vadodara man, 42, died following illegal detention and ill-treatment at Makarpura police station, Vadodara. The Court found he was picked up on 16 September 1994 without any complaint against him, detained under Section 151 CrPC in a small room with many others, beaten, and denied medicines, water and medical aid despite his known heart ailment, dying on 17 September 1994. It noted a Section 176 magisterial inquiry substantiating beating and negligence was buried while a departmental inquiry exonerated all. Holding the Article 21 violation established, the Court directed Rs 40,000 interim compensation to each of the four petitioners plus Rs 10,000 costs, and ordered the widow complaint to be registered as an FIR for independent investigation. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 3 May 2007, the Gujarat High Court (Coram: D. H. Waghela, J.) returned findings adverse to 3 police personnel, namely: Police Inspector, Makarpura Police Station; Police Sub-Inspector, Makarpura Police Station; Police Sub-Inspector, Makarpura Police Station, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 1.6 lakh (Rs 1,60,000).

Register number
GJ 06 CW 0005
Case reference
2007 CriLJ 4165
Court and date
Gujarat High Court (Coram: D. H. Waghela, J.), 3 May 2007
Officer(s) at the material time
Police Inspector, Makarpura Police Station; Police Sub-Inspector, Makarpura Police Station; Police Sub-Inspector, Makarpura Police Station
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Telltale signs of physical injuries on the body of the deceased, some of which were not noticed even in the inquest panchnama, and the medical opinion that they were ante mortem and inflicted within 72 hours of the death, have …” (at para 9.1)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 1.6 lakh (Rs 1,60,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Gujarat High Court judgment dated 3 May 2007 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Telltale signs of physical injuries on the body of the deceased, some of which were not noticed even in the inquest panchnama, and the medical opinion that they were ante mortem and inflicted within 72 hours of the death, have …” (para 9.1)

Institutional response

1
3 May 2007

Order issued

Concluded
Gujarat High Court External · Binding

The Gujarat High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 160,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: 2007 CriLJ 4165
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.