CW-2007-0008Mehsana, GujaratJudgment 13 June 2007

Kadi Police Police Head Constable vs State of Gujarat

The Gujarat High Court confirmed the bribe-trap conviction of Police Head Constable, Jamadar (Investigation) of Kadi police station, who demanded Rs 500 from advocate Jashvantkumar Patel for a favourable report in a Section 202 CrPC court inquiry and was caught accepting the balance Rs 300 in an ACB trap on 13.10.1984 with marked notes recovered from his pocket. The Court held demand and wilful acceptance proved by the complainant, the independent panch and the panchnama, and rejected the defence that the notes were forcibly planted. The appeal, continued by the appellant's widow after his death, was dismissed and the sentences of 1 year RI under Section 161 IPC and 3 years RI under Section 5(2) of the 1947 PC Act were confirmed.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 13 June 2007 in Criminal Appeal against Special (ACB) Case No. 3 of 1986, the Gujarat High Court (Coram: C.K. Buch, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Police Head Constable, Kadi Police Station, Mehsana.

Register number
GJ 02 CW 0002
Case reference
Criminal Appeal against Special (ACB) Case No. 3 of 1986 / 2007 CriLJ 3387; (2008) 1 GLR 551
Court and date
Gujarat High Court (Coram: C.K. Buch, J.), 13 June 2007
Officer(s) at the material time
Police Head Constable, Kadi Police Station, Mehsana
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947
Finding of the Court (extract)
“For short, there is no merits in the present appeal and hence the same requires to be dismissed. Hence, the present Criminal Appeal is hereby dismissed. The impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court …” (at para 14)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment; maximum substantive term of 3 years.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Gujarat High Court judgment dated 13 June 2007 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“For short, there is no merits in the present appeal and hence the same requires to be dismissed. Hence, the present Criminal Appeal is hereby dismissed. The impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court …” (para 14)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Gujarat High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Gujarat High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: 2007 CriLJ 3387; (2008) 1 GLR 551
Not yet re-checked.
13 Jun 2007

Order issued

Concluded
Gujarat High Court External · Binding

The Gujarat High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: 2007 CriLJ 3387; (2008) 1 GLR 551
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.