12 Dec 2007
Order issued
ConcludedThe Uttarakhand High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: (2007) 12 UK CK 0006; (2008) 8 UC 914
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2007-0015Udham Singh Nagar, UttarakhandJudgment 12 December 2007
Constable 40695 Baram Dutt vs State of Uttarakhand and Others
Replace closing boilerplate with the recorded State version: counter affidavit pleaded red-handed drunken catch, medical proof of consumption, appellant's guilty plea before the Assistant Commandant, and prior censure entries (para 4). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 12 December 2007 in Special Appeal No. 147 of 2007, the Uttarakhand High Court (Coram: Rajeev Gupta, J. C. S. Rawat, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Baram Dutt (Constable).
- Register number
- UK 06 CW 0001
- Case reference
- Special Appeal No. 147 of 2007 / (2007) 12 UK CK 0006; (2008) 8 UC 914
- Court and date
- Uttarakhand High Court (Coram: Rajeev Gupta, J. C. S. Rawat, JJ.), 12 December 2007
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Baram Dutt (Constable)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Rule 8(2)(b) of the UP Police Officers of Subordinate Rank (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1991
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “It is amply established that the Appellant had consumed the liquor on the relevant time and he was indulged in unbecoming behaviour. Thus, the learned Single Judge was justified in holding that the misconduct of Constable [name withheld] who was …” (at para 12)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Uttarakhand High Court judgment dated 12 December 2007 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“It is amply established that the Appellant had consumed the liquor on the relevant time and he was indulged in unbecoming behaviour. Thus, the learned Single Judge was justified in holding that the misconduct of Constable [name withheld] who was …” (para 12)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.