24 Apr 2007
Order issued
ConcludedThe Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: (2007) 5 ALD 314
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2007-0023Komaram Bheem Asifabad, TelanganaJudgment 24 April 2007
Tiryani Police Sub-Inspector v. Inspector General of Police, Warangal Range and Others
The judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court records the following account. Sub-Inspector of Tiryani police station, Adilabad district, faced a departmental enquiry on the charge of misusing his position by collecting Rs 6,500 from villagers of Burudagudem to favour accused in Crime No. 2 of 1995. The Inspector General of Police, Warangal Range imposed compulsory retirement in August 2001, affirmed in departmental appeal and revision, and the AP Administrative Tribunal refused to interfere. The Division Bench found the enquiry evidence, including the middleman who collected and passed the bribe to the SI, proved the charge, drawing support from the three-day detention followed by release of the accused. It held the Tribunal committed no error in refusing to interfere with the punishment, and dismissed the writ petition. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 24 April 2007 in Writ Petition No. 8019 of 2007, the Andhra Pradesh High Court (Coram: G.S. Singhvi, C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Sub-Inspector, Tiryani Police Station, Adilabad.
- Register number
- TG 20 CW 0001
- Case reference
- Writ Petition No. 8019 of 2007 / (2007) 5 ALD 314
- Court and date
- Andhra Pradesh High Court (Coram: G.S. Singhvi, C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, JJ.), 24 April 2007
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Sub-Inspector, Tiryani Police Station, Adilabad
- Present service status
- Recorded in the cited sources as compulsorily retired.
- Provisions invoked
- the AP Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1991; Rule 3 of the APCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964; Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Article 226 of the Constitution of India
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “In our opinion, the allegation levelled against the petitioner that he misused his official position in collecting Rs. 6,500/- from the villagers for releasing the accused persons has rightly been treated as proved because the money has, in fact, been …” (at para 22)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment dated 24 April 2007 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“In our opinion, the allegation levelled against the petitioner that he misused his official position in collecting Rs. 6,500/- from the villagers for releasing the accused persons has rightly been treated as proved because the money has, in fact, been …” (para 22)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.