30 Mar 2009
Order issued
ConcludedThe Madhya Pradesh High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: (2009) 3 MPLJ 338; (2009) 03 MP CK 0005
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2009-0021Bhopal, Madhya PradeshJudgment 30 March 2009
Bhopal Police Constable vs State of M.P. and Others
Remove victim's name (use role noun, e.g. 'a woman labourer') and replace final sentence with the recorded respondents' case: the State supported the dismissal, contending the DIG's suo motu revision under Regulation 270 was legal. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 30 March 2009 in Writ Petition No. 7220 of 2003 with O.A. No. 1352 of 2000, the Madhya Pradesh High Court (Coram: S.S. Kemkar, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Constable, 1st Battalion, SAF.
- Register number
- MP 01 CW 0002
- Case reference
- Writ Petition No. 7220 of 2003 with O.A. No. 1352 of 2000 / (2009) 3 MPLJ 338; (2009) 03 MP CK 0005
- Court and date
- Madhya Pradesh High Court (Coram: S.S. Kemkar, J.), 30 March 2009
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable, 1st Battalion, SAF
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Regulation Reg. 226 of the MP Police Regulations; Regulation Reg. 270 of the MP Police Regulations
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “In view of the aforesaid, no illegality is found in the impugned action and the order by which the petitioner has been dismissed from service.” (at para n/a)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment dated 30 March 2009 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“In view of the aforesaid, no illegality is found in the impugned action and the order by which the petitioner has been dismissed from service.” (para n/a)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.