CW-2009-0034Kottayam, KeralaJudgment 10 December 2009

Ettumanoor Police Deputy Superintendent of Police vs State of Kerala

The Kerala High Court Division Bench (judgment by P. Bhavadasan, J.) dismissed the appeals of [name withheld], a serving Deputy Superintendent of Police, and a second accused against their life sentences imposed by the Sessions Court, Kottayam (S.C. No. 145/2005) for the gruesome murder of an Ettumanoor man, a former driver, on 15 February 2005, and dismissed the State appeal seeking the death sentence. The Court held the prosecution proved murder by the guardian of law with hired accomplices over a personal grudge, with the body dismembered after death. It held that although a police officer crime must normally be viewed very seriously, the case fell outside the rarest-of-rare category, so capital punishment was refused. The Supreme Court dismissed [name withheld] further appeal (Crl.A. No. 1774/2010) on 4 February 2013, leaving the life sentence final. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 10 December 2009 in Crl.A. Nos. 86/2006, 193/2006 and 1796/2007, the Kerala High Court (Coram: K. Balakrishnan Nair J., P. Bhavadasan J., JJ.) affirmed the conviction of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Malappuram (posting at relevant time).

Register number
KL 05 CW 0002
Case reference
Crl.A. Nos. 86/2006, 193/2006 and 1796/2007
Court and date
Kerala High Court (Coram: K. Balakrishnan Nair J., P. Bhavadasan J., JJ.), 10 December 2009
Officer(s) at the material time
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Malappuram (posting at relevant time)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The case from which these appeals arise reveals a gruesome and horrendous murder by the guardian of law along with four others, three of whom are mercenaries.” (at para 1)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Kerala High Court judgment dated 10 December 2009 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“The case from which these appeals arise reveals a gruesome and horrendous murder by the guardian of law along with four others, three of whom are mercenaries.” (para 1)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Kerala High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Kerala High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: Crl.A. Nos. 86/2006, 193/2006 and 1796/2007
Not yet re-checked.
10 Dec 2009

Order issued

Concluded
Kerala High Court External · Binding

The Kerala High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: Crl.A. Nos. 86/2006, 193/2006 and 1796/2007
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.