Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: Crl.A. Nos. 82 & 75/2002
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2010-0036North East Delhi, DelhiJudgment 2 November 2010
Delhi Police Constable and others vs CBI
The judgment of the Delhi High Court records the following account. PS Gokulpuri staff lifted a Gokulpuri man from his jhuggi on the night of 28-29 March 1994, detained him overnight and released him with a direction to pay Rs 5,000; Constable collected the treated notes at a Gokulpuri man's house on 31 March 1994 and was caught in the CBI trap. The Special Judge convicted [name withheld] and Head Constable in January 2002. The Delhi High Court held the case proved beyond doubt against [name withheld] through the complainant, shadow witness and recovery evidence with matching notes and pink washes, and upheld his conviction and sentence in full. It acquitted [name withheld] on benefit of doubt as he was absent from the trap spot, and disposed of both appeals accordingly.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 2 November 2010 in Crl.A. Nos. 82 & 75/2002, the Delhi High Court (Coram: Sanjiv Khanna, J.) affirmed the conviction of 2 police personnel, namely: Constable, Delhi Police, Police Station Gokulpuri; Head Constable, Delhi Police, Police Station Gokulpuri.
- Register number
- DL 05 CW 0010
- Case reference
- Crl.A. Nos. 82 & 75/2002
- Court and date
- Delhi High Court (Coram: Sanjiv Khanna, J.), 2 November 2010
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable, Delhi Police, Police Station Gokulpuri; Head Constable, Delhi Police, Police Station Gokulpuri
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “As held above, the conviction and sentence of [name withheld] u/s 7 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the PC Act is upheld and maintained.” (at para 32)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 3 years.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Delhi High Court judgment dated 2 November 2010 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“As held above, the conviction and sentence of [name withheld] u/s 7 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the PC Act is upheld and maintained.” (para 32)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
2 Nov 2010
Order issued
ConcludedThe Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: Crl.A. Nos. 82 & 75/2002
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.