CW-2011-0005Sakti, ChhattisgarhJudgment 30 March 2011

Raipura Man v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

A Raipura man, arrested on suspicion of theft, was taken handcuffed and chained by two PS Baradwar police officials to Kumhiya pond at village Raipura to recover a concealed brass vessel and compelled to dive in; he drowned and his body was found floating on 21 October 1997. The court found sheer negligence and callous, high-handed custodial action, noting that respondent No 3 stood convicted under Section 304-A IPC by the trial court in 2008 while respondent No 4 was acquitted. Following Nilabati Behera, the court allowed the Article 226 petition and awarded Rs 1.5 lakh compensation to the father, Dukhuram, leaving him free to pursue traditional remedies for any balance. The incident predates the creation of Janjgir-Champa (1998), Sakti (2022) and Chhattisgarh state (2000). Respondent No. 4, who is not named in the judgment, was acquitted of the charges by the trial court on 18 February 2008 while respondent No. 3 was held guilty under Section 304A IPC; no culpability finding in this judgment runs against respondent No. 4. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 30 March 2011 in Writ Petition No. 1427 of 2004, the Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Police personnel, PS Baradwar; Police personnel, PS Baradwar, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 1.5 lakh (Rs 1,50,000).

Register number
CG 00 CW 0001
Case reference
Writ Petition No. 1427 of 2004
Court and date
Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.), 30 March 2011
Officer(s) at the material time
Police personnel, PS Baradwar; Police personnel, PS Baradwar
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Article 21 of the Constitution of India; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; Article 32 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The judgment of the Trial Court clearly shows that the deceased-a Raipura man died due to negligent act of respondent No. 3.” (at para 5)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 1.5 lakh (Rs 1,50,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Chhattisgarh High Court judgment dated 30 March 2011 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“The judgment of the Trial Court clearly shows that the deceased-a Raipura man died due to negligent act of respondent No. 3.” (para 5)

Institutional response

1
30 Mar 2011

Order issued

Concluded
Chhattisgarh High Court External · Binding

The Chhattisgarh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 150,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: Writ Petition No. 1427 of 2004
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.