CW-2011-0011New Delhi, DelhiJudgment 4 July 2011

New Delhi Man vs Union of India; Jaspal Kaur vs Union of India

The Delhi High Court awarded Rs 15,00,000 each to the families of a New Delhi man and a New Delhi man, the two businessmen killed in the Connaught Place fake encounter of 31 March 1997, holding the State's liability to compensate for the callous and wanton killing undoubted. With ten Crime Branch policemen led by ACP Satyavir Singh Rathi already convicted of murder at trial, the Court computed pecuniary dependency with CPI-indexed non-pecuniary compensation, interest and costs. It held that criminal trial, disciplinary action and constitutional-court reparation are three independent facets of accountability, and expressed surprise that Delhi Police rules let convicted murderers remain in service pending appeal.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 4 July 2011 in W.P.(C) Nos. 4756 & 5405/1997, the Delhi High Court (Coram: S. Muralidhar, J.) returned findings adverse to 10 police personnel, namely: Satyavir Singh Rathi (Assistant Commissioner of Police); Anil Kumar (Inspector); Police personnel, Inter-State Cell, Crime Branch, Delhi Police; Shiv Kumar (Head Constable); Police personnel, Inter-State Cell, Crime Branch, Delhi Police; Police personnel, Inter-State Cell, Crime Branch, Delhi Police; Sunil Kumar (Constable); Subhash Chand (Constable); Police personnel, Inter-State Cell, Crime Branch, Delhi Police; Sumer Singh (Constable), and directed payment of compensation of Rs 30 lakh (Rs 30,00,000).

Register number
DL 02 CW 0006
Case reference
W.P.(C) Nos. 4756 & 5405/1997 / (2011) 125 DRJ 273
Court and date
Delhi High Court (Coram: S. Muralidhar, J.), 4 July 2011
Officer(s) at the material time
Satyavir Singh Rathi (Assistant Commissioner of Police); Anil Kumar (Inspector); Police personnel, Inter-State Cell, Crime Branch, Delhi Police; Shiv Kumar (Head Constable); Police personnel, Inter-State Cell, Crime Branch, Delhi Police; Police personnel, Inter-State Cell, Crime Branch, Delhi Police; Sunil Kumar (Constable); Subhash Chand (Constable); Police personnel, Inter-State Cell, Crime Branch, Delhi Police; Sumer Singh (Constable)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“a sum of Rs. 15 lakhs being the compensation amount payable to the Petitioner and her two children. The Registrar General will within a week thereafter pay Rs. 5,00,000/- each to Jaspal Kaur and her two children on proper identification.” (at para 33)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 30 lakh (Rs 30,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Delhi High Court judgment dated 4 July 2011 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“a sum of Rs. 15 lakhs being the compensation amount payable to the Petitioner and her two children. The Registrar General will within a week thereafter pay Rs. 5,00,000/- each to Jaspal Kaur and her two children on proper identification.” (para 33)

Institutional response

1
4 Jul 2011

Order issued

Concluded
Delhi High Court External · Binding

The Delhi High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 3,000,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: (2011) 125 DRJ 273
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.