CW-2011-0016Imphal West, ManipurJudgment 25 August 2011

New Tairenpokpi Man v. State of Manipur & Ors.

The judgment of the Gauhati High Court records the following account. On 24 March 2009, civilian construction labourer and tutor a New Tairenpokpi man was picked up by plainclothes personnel of the combined Imphal West Police Commando and 16 Assam Rifles force while on his way to a Youth, and was shot dead the same evening at New Tairenpokpi; a false KYKL-encounter case was registered at Lamshang PS. The Addl. District Judge inquiry found no evidence he was a KYKL member and rejected the encounter version. The Court held the petitioner's case more trustworthy, found an established Article 21 violation, and awarded Rs 5,00,000 exemplary damages shared equally by the State and the Union/AR plus Rs 6,000 costs, preserving criminal remedies. Decided by the Gauhati High Court (Imphal Bench). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 25 August 2011 in W.P.(Cril.) No. 71 of 2009, the Gauhati High Court (Coram: T. Nandakumar Singh, Mutum Binoykumar Singh, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the accused police personnel, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 5 lakh (Rs 5,00,000).

Register number
MN 01 CW 0005
Case reference
W.P.(Cril.) No. 71 of 2009
Court and date
Gauhati High Court (Coram: T. Nandakumar Singh, Mutum Binoykumar Singh, JJ.), 25 August 2011
Officer(s) at the material time
Not identified in the cited sources (Imphal West Police Commando with 16 Assam Rifles (combined force; FIR No. 16(3)09, Lamshang PS))
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 21 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“In the present case, on careful perusal of the statements of PWs before the learned Addl District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court, Imphal East) and also the annexures in the present writ petition, it appears that the case of …” (at para 16)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 5 lakh (Rs 5,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Gauhati High Court judgment dated 25 August 2011 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“In the present case, on careful perusal of the statements of PWs before the learned Addl District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court, Imphal East) and also the annexures in the present writ petition, it appears that the case of …” (para 16)

Institutional response

1
25 Aug 2011

Order issued

Concluded
Gauhati High Court External · Binding

The Gauhati High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 500,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: W.P.(Cril.) No. 71 of 2009
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.