Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: Crl.A. No. 746/2002
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2011-0029South East Delhi, DelhiJudgment 23 May 2011
Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector vs Central Bureau of Investigation
The judgment of the Delhi High Court records the following account. ASI, investigating officer of FIR No. 304/93, demanded Rs 500 per court hearing from the accused [name withheld] in exchange for weakening the evidence, and accepted the money at Patiala House Courts in a CBI trap on 28 October 1996. The Special Judge convicted him under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the PC Act and imposed four years RI per count in September 2001. The Delhi High Court held demand, acceptance and recovery proved beyond reasonable doubt through the complainant, shadow and recovery witnesses and matching tainted notes with positive hand washes. It maintained the conviction, reduced the sentence to two years RI on each count concurrent, dismissed the appeal and ordered the accused taken into custody.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 23 May 2011 in Crl.A. No. 746/2002, the Delhi High Court (Coram: M.L. Mehta, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Assistant Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Police Station Nizammuddin.
- Register number
- DL 03 CW 0012
- Case reference
- Crl.A. No. 746/2002
- Court and date
- Delhi High Court (Coram: M.L. Mehta, J.), 23 May 2011
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Assistant Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Police Station Nizammuddin
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “while maintaining the conviction as awarded by the learned Special Judge, I am of the view that ends of justice would be met by sentencing the accused to two years of rigorous imprisonment on each count.” (at para 33)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 2 years.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Delhi High Court judgment dated 23 May 2011 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“while maintaining the conviction as awarded by the learned Special Judge, I am of the view that ends of justice would be met by sentencing the accused to two years of rigorous imprisonment on each count.” (para 33)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
23 May 2011
Order issued
ConcludedThe Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: Crl.A. No. 746/2002
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.