CW-2011-0043Ganderbal, Jammu and KashmirJudgment 22 October 2011

Ganderbal Man vs Union of India and Others

A Ganderbal man was arrested by SOG personnel at Ganderbal and killed in custody, his body handed to relatives the next day; local police refused to register an FIR until the High Court ordered it (FIR No. 107/2002). The court recorded the State's admission that its own investigation had established the involvement of DySP [name withheld] and SPO [name withheld] in the death, and that the criminal case was later closed as untraced after both officers died. The court held the family had lost its sole bread earner, awarded Rs 3 lakh compensation saddled on the State Government payable within three months, and directed the State to consider the petitioner for compassionate appointment under SRO 43 with age relaxation. It clarified the award would not bar the family from seeking further compensation through appropriate remedy. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 22 October 2011 in OWP No. 352 of 2007, the Jammu and Kashmir High Court (Coram: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Deputy Superintendent of Police, Special Operations Group, Ganderbal; Special Police Officer, Special Operations Group, Ganderbal, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 3 lakh (Rs 3,00,000).

Register number
JK 16 CW 0001
Case reference
OWP No. 352 of 2007 / (2011) 4 JKJ 327
Court and date
Jammu and Kashmir High Court (Coram: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.), 22 October 2011
Officer(s) at the material time
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Special Operations Group, Ganderbal; Special Police Officer, Special Operations Group, Ganderbal
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
J&K SRO 43
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Admittedly in terms of the report of Investigating Officer, respondents have admitted that investigation was conducted and it was established during such investigation that two Police Officers, [name withheld] and [name withheld] were involved in the death of the deceased …” (at para 8)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 3 lakh (Rs 3,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court judgment dated 22 October 2011 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Admittedly in terms of the report of Investigating Officer, respondents have admitted that investigation was conducted and it was established during such investigation that two Police Officers, [name withheld] and [name withheld] were involved in the death of the deceased …” (para 8)

Institutional response

1
22 Oct 2011

Order issued

Concluded
Jammu and Kashmir High Court External · Binding

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 300,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: (2011) 4 JKJ 327
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.