The judgment of the Rajasthan High Court records the following account. A Rajasthan man had surrendered on 9 September 1985 and was acquitted on 6 March 1992, but the 1985 arrest warrant was never recalled. The court found that police arrested him on 16 May 2005 on that dead warrant, kept him overnight at the police station despite his protest, and he secured bail only on 19 May 2005. The Division Bench held the arrest grossly negligent and illegal, set aside the Single Bench order denying relief, and awarded Rs 25,000 compensation with 6% interest on default. It also directed the DGP, Rajasthan to review dead warrants and order yearly reviews. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 21 May 2012 in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1034/2008 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5301/2005, the Rajasthan High Court (Coram: Arun Mishra, Narendra Kumar Jain-I, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Station House Officer, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 25,000.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
The Rajasthan High Court judgment dated 21 May 2012 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“It is case of illegal detention of the appellant in execution of warrant of arrest, which ceased to be effective way back in the year 1985.”
The Rajasthan High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 25,000.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.
