The judgment of the Bombay High Court records the following account. Sagar Ubhe alleged he was picked up on 25.01.2012 and kept at Crime Branch Unit II, Pune without intimation or magistrate production till 30.01.2012, beaten to extract a confession; police claimed arrest only on 29.01.2012. A JMFC enquiry found illegal detention and tampering of the arrest register date. The court accepted the enquiry report, held the 25-30 January 2012 detention and the subsequent Yerawada re-arrest entirely illegal, and directed the State to pay Rs.5,00,000 compensation within 8 weeks. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 7 January 2014 in Writ Petition No. 499 of 2012, the Bombay High Court (Coram: S.C. Dharmadhikari, G.S. Patel, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Police Constable, Crime Branch Unit II, Pune; Police Constable, Crime Branch Unit II, Pune, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 5 lakh (Rs 5,00,000).
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
The Bombay High Court judgment dated 7 January 2014 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“Following D. K. Basu, we must, therefore, hold that the detention of the petitioner from 25th January 2012 to 30th January 2012 was entirely illegal, as was his subsequent arrest by the Yerawada police.” (para 27)
The Bombay High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 500,000.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.
