Order issued
ConcludedThe Bombay High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 20,000.
The judgment of the Bombay High Court records the following account. Two Bhusawal labourers who went to lodge a complaint were instead detained on 23.08.2005, arrested under s.41(2) CrPC in chapter cases under s.110(e)(g), and kept in custody till 27.08.2005 though relatives were ready with sureties. The court held there is no power to arrest on initiation of chapter proceedings, the s.41(2) arrest was unwarranted, and CrPC, constitutional and D.K. Basu safeguards were ignored. It directed the State to pay Rs.10,000 to each petitioner and to hold a departmental inquiry against the two named officers. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 30 July 2014 in Criminal Writ Petition No. 16 of 2006, the Bombay High Court (Coram: S.S. Shinde, P.R. Bora, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Assistant Police Inspector, City Police Station, Bhusawal, Jalgaon; Police Inspector, Local Crime Branch, Jalgaon, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 20,000.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
The Bombay High Court judgment dated 30 July 2014 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“Therefore, in the light of the discussion herein above, the arrest of the petitioners on 23rd August, 2005 was illegal.” (para 10)
The Bombay High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 20,000.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.